Measuring Willingness to Pay for Economic and Ecological Services in Tandooreh National Park

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 4, Volume 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 38, December 2017, Pages 1007-1021   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v10i4.29972

Authors

Mohammad Ghorbani¹; Alireza Koocheki^{* 2}; Mohsen Rajabzadeh³

¹Department of Agricultural Economy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³Kheradgarayan Motahar Institute of Higher Education, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
National parks are particularly important in terms of conservation of genetic pools and providing different economic and ecological services and goods. Evaluation of economic values of these services gives insight to policy makers for better understanding of the importance of these assets. Today evaluation of ecosystems services and goods is given momentum in the context of ecological economics worldwide. Besides other important services provided by the natural resources such as national parks including genetic conservation, soil protection, enhancement of hydrologic cycle, carbon sequestration and mitigation of climate change, outdoor  recreation is an important service which mostly demanded by urban population of big cities. Different methods can be applied for evaluation of these services. In this case it has been observed that in Tabriz, each individual is willing to pay 41140 Rials (Rls) for protection of environment. It is also reported that for recreation purposes each family was willing to pay 20000 Rls per night to be allowed to camp in a natural environment. It was shown in an evaluation that for recreation in northern forest areas, 65.8 percent of the people were willing to pay a reasonable sum of money which was 15153 Rls per month to entry. Estimated recreational value of Sisangan National Park is 52.235 million Rls per day. In another study it was observed that willingness to pay for visitors of the same park was 2477 Rls for each visit. Protecting value and also recreational value of this park was estimated to be 5.8 and 2.5 million Rls per hectare, respectively. There are numerous studies on this issue in other countries. As an example, Maille & Mendelsohn (1991) estimated recreational values of Madagascar forests to be 360 to 468 dollars per hectare. Tandooreh National Park is located in a mountains area of Khorasan Razavi with an area of 37800 hectares. It is a part of Harirrood and Khashafrood rivers catchment and sub-catchment of Daroongar River.
 Materials and Methods
In this study, contingent valuation method was used. This method is normally used for none consumable and none marketable of natural and environmental goods and willingness to pay of individuals under an assumed market is assessed. For assessing willingness to pay, Double-Bounded dichotomous questionnaire method was used.
Results and Discussions
In our study the aim of 77.1 percent of the interviewed persons visited the park for recreation and 22.9 percent was for other purposes. From the total of 144 samples, 18.1 percent replied that the purpose of visiting the park is clean air and a favorable environment, 6.9 percent to collect medicinal plants, forage and other special plants, 13.9 percent for animal watching and hunting birds, 4.2 percent for use of mineral water and 56.9 percent for all services mentioned. The average number of days that a family stayed was 1.56 and total coast of travelling was 397375 Rls for each family. The amount of money willing to pay per month for each family household was 7098.2 Rls for recreation and 241819.5 for mineral water, 74062.5 for hunting, 15013.9 for forage and 14402.1 Rls for medicinal plants.
Willingness to pay for hunting was rather higher than other services and for recreational willingness to pay this was the lowest.
Conclusion:
 Willingness to pay is a tool to evaluate the economic and ecological benefits of the natural environment. This was apply to the present study and the results showed that most of the visitors are willing to pay a sum of money based on their purpose of the visit either for recreation or collection of plants or even bird hunting, the latter seems to be more attractive to some individuals.
Acknowledgement
This research (16794.2) was funded by vice chancellor for research of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, which is hereby acknowledged

Keywords

value; Willingness to pay; National park; elasticity

References

Akbari, N.A., and Jamshidi, N. 2004. The study of domestic tourisms willingness to pay for resident in camp. Economic Researches Journal 35: 107-130.

Amirnejad, H., and Khalilian, S. 2006. Estimating the existing value of Iran's North forests using contingent valuation method. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Journal 2: 144-153.

Amirnejad, H., Khalilian, S., and Asareh, M.H. 2006. Determine the recreation and conservation value of Sisangan forest park of Noshahr using willingness to pay. Quarterly Journal of Pajohesh and Sazandegi in Natural Resources 72: 15-24. (In Persian with English Summary)

Asgari, A., and Mehregan, N. 2001. Estimating the willingness to pay of visitors of cultural-historical heritage using CV method: Case study Hamedans' Ganjnameh. Quarterly Journal of Economics Researches 2: 93-115.

Cochran, W.G. 1967. Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley.

Garrod, G., and Willis, K. 1997. The recreational value of tropical forests in Malaysia. Journal of World Forest Resource Management 8: 183-201.

Ghorbani, M., and Firoozzare, A. 2008. Introduction to environment valuation. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)

Ghorbani, M., and Koocheki, A. 2009. Economic- ecological valuation of Tandoreh National Park. Research Project of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian with English Summery)

Ghorbani, M., and Sadeghi Lotfabadi, S. 2010. Determinants of willingness to pay and tourism value of National park: Case study Tandoreh National Park. Agricultural Economics and Development Journal 24: 425-432.

Kavianpour, K., and Esmaeeli, A. 2002. Recreation valuation (economic) of Sisangan forest park. Journal of Pajohesh and Sazandegi in Natural Resources 15: 90-95. (In Persian with English Summery)

Khorshiddost, A.M. 2004. Application of contingent valuation method to estimate the willingness to pay to Tabriz environment conservation. Environment Journal 36: 13-20.

Kristrom, B. 1999. Valuing forests. Stockholm: MBG press, St Louis, Sweden.

Kuosmanen, T., and Kortelainen, M. 2007. Methods valuing environmental factors in cost-benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis. Ecological Economics 62: 56-65.

Loomis, J.B., and Gonzales-Cabon, A. 1998. A willingness to pay function for protecting acres of spotted Owl habitat from fire. Ecological Economics 25: 315-322.

Maille, P., and Mendelsohn, R. 1991. Valuing ecotourism in Madagascar. New Haven: Yale school of Forestry. Mimeo.

Sattout, E.J., Talhouk, S.N., and Caligari, P.D.S. 2000. Analysis economic value of cedar relics in Lebanon: An application of contingent valuation method for conservation. Ecological Economics 61: 315-322.

Shrestha, R.K., Seidl, A.F., and Moraes, A.S. 2002. Value of recreational fishing in Brazilian Pantanal: a Travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics 42: 289-299.