The Effect of Nano and Non-Nano Zinc Oxide Particles Foliar Application on Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean (Vigna radiate) Under Drought Stress

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 12, Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 36, January 2015, Pages 727-737   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v12i4.24603

Authors

H Shojaei¹; H Makarian^{* 2}

¹Damghan Branch

²University of Shahrood

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effects of nanosized and non-nano zinc oxide foliar application on yield and yield components of mungbean under water stress in Shahrood Agricultural Research Center during 2011-2012. The experiment was arranged as split plot based on randomized complete block design with four replications. Water stress at three levels (control, cutting of irrigation in 50% flowering and 50% pod setting stages) were assigned as main plots and zinc oxide foliar application in five levels (control, 5 and 10 gl-1 nanosized zinc oxide and 5 and 10 gl-1 non-nano-scale zinc oxide) were randomized in sub-plots. Results showed that in comparison with full irrigation, water stress in flowering and pod setting stages decreased mungbean yield 2.2 and 4 percent respectively. Nano and non-nano zinc foliar application increased number of pod per plant, seed per pod, 1000-seed weight and total dry weight in water stress and non-water stress treatments significantly. Foliar application of 10 gl-1 nanosized zinc oxide particles compared to control increased mungbean yield 6.6, 3.6 and 5.4 percent in non-water stress, water stress in flowering and pod setting stages treatments respectively. It can be concluded that foliar application of zinc as nano particles can enhance the yield of mungbean more than zinc oxide under water stress conditions.

Keywords

Water stress; Legumes; Nano- Nutrients; Micronutrients

References

1- آمار ماهیانه هواشناسی شاهرود مربوط به سال 1391 اخذ شده از سایت سازمان هواشناسی استان سمنان به آدرس: http://www.semnanweather.ir/cities_statistics2.php?index=2

2- ترابیان، ش. و م. زاهدی . 1392. تاثیر تغذیه برگی سولفات آهن به دو شکل معمول و نانو ذرات بر رشد ارقام آفتابگردان تحت تنش شوری. مجله علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران 1: 118-109.

3- ثمن، م.، ع. سپهری و گ. احمدوند . 1390. تجمع ماده خشک و تولید متابولیت های سازگار در شش ژنوتیپ نخود تحت سطوح مختلف رطوبت خاک. مجله زیست شناسی ایران 24. 389-373.

4- جابرزاده ا. معاونی پ. توحیدی مقدم ح. و مرادی ا . 1389. بررسی اثر محلول پاشی نانو ذرات دی اکسید تیتانیوم بر روی برخی خصوصیات زراعی در گندم تحت شرایط تنش خشکی. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی 2: 301- 295.

5- جلیل شش بهره م. و موحدی دهنوی م . 1391. اثر محلول پاشی روی و آهن بر بنیه بذر سویا رشد کرده در شرایط تنش خشکی. مجله الکترونیک تولید گیاهان زراعی 5: 35-19.

6- خوشوقتی ح. 1385. اثرات محدودیت آب بر روند رشد و عملکرد سه رقم لوبیا چیتی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه تبریز. 114 صفحه.

7- دلفانی م. 1390. تاثیر محلول پاشی نانو ذره آهن و منیزیم بر برخی خصوصیات مورفولوژیک و فیزیولوژیک لوبیا چشم بلبلی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد زراعت. دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود. 170 صفحه.

8- راعی ی. مقصی ن. و سید شریفی ر . 1386. اثر سطوح مختلف آبیاری و تراکم بوته و اجزای آن در نخود نوع دسی کاکا (تیپ دسی). مجله علوم زراعی ایران 4: 381- 371.

9- رضایی ع. و کامگار حقیقی ع. ا . 1388. اثر تنش رطوبتی در مراحل مختلف رشد بر عملکرد گیاه لوبیا چشم بلبلی. مجله پژوهشهای خاک (علوم خاک و آب) 23: 124-117.

10- زند ب. سروش زاده ع. قناتی ف. و مرادی ف . 1388. اثر محلول پاشی عنصر روی و تنظیم کننده رشد اکسین بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه ذرت علو فه ای در شرایط کمبود آب. مجله به زراعی نهال و بذر 25: 448-431.

11- علی نژاد د. و گلی ه . 1384. نانو کامپوزیت ها و کاربردهای آنها، نشر زبان تصویر، 120صفحه.

12- علیزاده ا. مجیدی ا. نادیان ح. ا. نورمحمدی ق. و عامریان م. ر . 1388 بررسی اثر تنش خشکی و مقادیر مختلف نیتروژن بر فنولوژی و رشد و نمو ذرت. مجله علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی 5: 319-309.

13- مجنون حسینی ن . 1387. زراعت و تولید حبوبات. چاپ چهارم. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.283 صفحه.

14- Ahmadi, M. 2010. Effect of zinc sulfate fertilizer on physiological characteristics and yield of chickpea under different planting densities. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of Plant Agriculture reform, 2-4 Jul. 2010.Tehran, Iran.

15- Banks, L. W. 2004. Effect of timing of foliar zinc fertilizer on yield component of soybeans. Australian Journal of Exjerimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 22: 226- 231.

16- Basole, V. D., R. D. Deotale, S. R. Ilmulwar, S. S. Raut, and S. B. Kadwe. 2003. Effect of hormone and nutrients on morpho-physiological characters and yield of soybean. J. Soils and Crops, 13: 135-139.

17-Baybordi A. 2006. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition. Parivar Press. 179-185.

18- Behboudian M. H., Qifu M., Neil C., Turner J., and Palta A. 2001. Reactions of chickpea to water stress: yield and seed composition. Journal of Science Food Agriculture, 81: 13. 1288-1291.

19- Ben Ghnaya A. 2007. Morphological and physiological characteristics of rapeseed plants regenerated in vitro from thin cell layers in the presence of zinc. Plant Biology, 330: 728- 734.

20-Chaker-alhosseini M.H., Mohtashami R., and Oleiaei H.R. 2009. Effects of rate, source,and method of zinc fertilizer application on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Rice (Choram 1). Journal of Research in Agricultural Science, 5: 33-43.

21-Chaves M.M., Maroco J.P., Periera S., Rodrigues M.L., Ricarddo C.P.P., Osorio M.L., Carvalho I., Faria T., and Pinheiro C. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth Annals Botany, 98: 907-916.

22-Davis S., Turner N. C., Siddique K. H. M., Leport L., and Plummer J.1999. Seed growth of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in a short season Mediterranean type environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 39:181–188.

23-Dominique D., Tung-Thanh H., and Pierre R. 2000. Identification of soybean plant characteristics that indicate the timing of drought stress, Crop Science, pp: 716-722.

24-Green J.M. and Beestman G.B. 2007. Recently patented and commercialized formulation and adjuvant technology, Crop Protection, 26: 320–327.

25-Jalilian J. 2011. Evaluation of seed priming to improve germination and seedling growth of mungbean hydrocarbons under conditions of dehydration. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Pulse Crops, 19 - 20 feb. 2011. Arak, Iran.

26-Kassab, O.M. 2005. Soil moisture stress and micronutrients foliar application effects on the growth and yield of mungbean plants. Journal of Agricultural. Science, 30: 247-256.

27-Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London. 889 pp.

28-Moghadam M., Pakniat H. and Farshadfar, A. 2007. Evolution of drought tolerance of chickpea lines using agro- Physiologic characteristic. Seed and Plant, 4: 325- 342.

29-Monica, R. C. and Cremonini, R. 2009. Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia, 62: 161-165.

30-Nair R., Hanna Varghese S., Nair B.G., Maekawa T., Yoshida Y. and Sakthi kumar D. 2010. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Science, 179: 154-163.

31-Pandey A C., Sanjay S. S. and Yadav R. S. 2010. Application of ZnO nanoparticles in influencing the growth rate of Cicer arietinum L. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 5: 488-497.

32-Pandey N., Pathak G.C., and Sharma C.P. 2006. Zinc is critically required for pollen function and fertilization in lentil. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 20: 89-96.

33-Pandey R.K., Herrera W.A.T., Villegas A.N., and Pendle-ton J.W. 1984. Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient: III. Plant growth Agronomy Journal, 76: 557-560.

34-Rose L.A., Feltion W.L., and Banks L.W. 2002. Responses of four soybean varieties to foliar zinc fertilizer. Australian Journal of Exjerimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 21: 236-240.

35-Taleie A., Postini K., and Dawazdeh Emami C. 2000. Effects of plant density on physiological characteristics of common bean bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 31:477-487.

36-Thalooth A.T., Tawfik M.M., Magda Mohamad H. 2006. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions, Bulletin of Egypt. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2: 37-46.

37-Thomas R., Robertson M. J., Fukai S., and Peoples M. B. 2003. The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth development , yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of Mung bean. Field Crop Research, 86: 67-80.

38-Turner N., Xiangwen F., Fengmin L. and Kadambot H. M. 2002. Flower numbers pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under terminal drought. Oxford J. Life Science, 61: 335- 345.

39-Wakrim R., Wahabi S., Tahi H., Aganchich B., and Serraj R. 2005. Comparative effect of partial root drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on water relation and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 106: 275-287.

40 -Welch, R. M. 2001. Impact of mineral nutrients in plants on human nutrition on a worldwide scale. Plant Nutrition, 92: 284-285.