Evaluation of Yield and Yield Components of Common Millet and Soybean in Different Intercropping Ratios under Deficit Irrigation Levels in Hamden Region

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 3, Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 52, January 2019, Pages 761-779   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v16i4.66825

Authors

S Hajinia¹; G Ahmadvand^{* 1}; A. A Mehrabi²

¹University of Bu Ali Sina

²University of Ilam

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is one of the major abiotic stress limiting plants growth and productivity across the world. Intercropping increased the efficiency of water utilization. In arid and semi-arid regions, intercropping can improve water use efficiency and water conservation in soil. Because intercropped plants use water efficiently and caused increasing of water use efficiency. Intercropping of legumes and cereals compared with corresponding sole cropping is common and might be beneficial in semi-arid regions particularly in resource limiting conditions. Do and Goutan (1987) reported that millet can be planted in mixture with some plants such as cowpea, sorghum, peanut and soybean. The aim of the investigation was to study the impact of intercropping on the growth and yield of millet and soybean under deficit irrigation.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was carried out as a split-plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications, at the Research Farm of Agricultural Faculty of Bu-Ali Sina University in 2015. The main factor included three levels of deficit irrigation (irrigation after 60 (well-watered), 90 (mild stress) and 120 (severe stress) mm by using of class A evaporation pan) and five levels of replacement intercropping consisted of monoculture of soybean, monoculture of millet, 67% soybean+ 33% millet (67S:33M), 50% soybean+ 50% millet (50S:50M) and 33% soybean+ 67% millet (33S:67M) as subplot.
Results and Discussion
Water stress decreased chlorophyll concentration of millet and soybean. In all intercropping ratios, the chlorophyll concentration of soybean was higher than its monoculture. The rate of increase in chlorophyll concentration in (67S:33M), (50S:50M), and (33S:67M) ratios compared to monoculture of soybean, were 8.43, 8.57 and 8.76 percent respectively. The highest total chlorophyll content of millet was obtained in (50S:50M) and (33S:67M) ratios, that was 12.34 and 12.09 percent higher than monoculture of millet, respectively. The highest number of panicles per plant of millet was obtained from (50S:50M) and (67S:33M) ratios under well-watered, and the lowest one was observed in monoculture of millet under severe water stress. The highest number of seed per panicles of millet was observed at intercropping of 33S:67M, 50S:50M and 67S:33M treatments under well-watered, and the lowest value was measured in monoculture of millet under sever water stress. Water stress decreased number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100-seed weight of soybean, compared to well-watered. Number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100-seed weight of soybean reduced in severe water stress were about 50.58, 33.68 and 26.09 percent, respectively, compared to well-watered. The number of pods per plant of soybean plants in all intercropping patterns was higher than monoculture of soybean. The rate of increase in number of pods per plant in (67S:33M), (50S:50M), and (33S:67M) ratios, were 6.38, 11.63 and 7.75 percent respectively, compared to monoculture of soybean. The highest seeds per pod of soybean was obtained in (50S:50M) ratio by 13.78 percent higher than monoculture of soybean. Water stress reduced grain yield of millet and soybean by 46.8 and 50.05 percent, respectively. Under well-watered condition, the highest yield of millet was obtained in (67S:33M) and (50S:50M) ratios. The highest actual yield of soybean was observed in (50S:50M) ratio by. Maximum value of LER (1.14) was achieved in (50S:50M) ratio intercropping in severe stress.
Conclusions
The best planting pattern to obtain maximum yield of millet and soybean was (50S:50M) ratio. The difference in rooting millet with soybean and better use of water in different soil depths could be reason to the high yield under water stress, the show millet and soybean intercropping were complementary.

Keywords

Chlorophyll; Irrigation; Land equivalent ratio; Pattern planting

References

1. Abdul Jaleel, C., Manivannan, P., Lakshamanan, G. M., Gomathinayagam, M., and Panneerselvam, R. 2008. Alterations in morphological parameters and photosynthetic pigment responses of Catharanthus roseus under soil water deficits. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces 61: 298-303.

2. Aboutalebian, M. A., and Khalili, M. 2014. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium japonicum on yield and yield componentsof soybean under water stress. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Science 45 (2): 169-181. (in Persian with English abstract).

3. Agegnnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., and Sinebo, W. 2006. Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Etthiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 202-207.

4. Allahdadi, M., Shakiba, M. R., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, A., and Amini, R. 2013. Evaluation of competition, yield quantity and quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) Merrill.) and calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) in intercropping systems. Journal of Agroecology 7 (1): 38-51. (in Persian with English abstract).

5. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome.

6. Arnon, I. 1975. Physiological Principles of Dry Land Crop Production. Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming. US Gupta, ed. Oxfrd Press.

7. Azizi, E., Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Nassiri-Mahallati, N. 2015. Interaction of nutrient resource and crop diversity on resource use efficiency in different cropping systems. Journal of Agroecology 7 (1): 1-19. (in Persian with English abstract).

8. Bagheri Shirvan, M., Zaefarian, F., Bicharanlou, B., and Asadi, G.A. 2014. Evaluation of replacement intercropping of soybean (Glycine max L.) with sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and borage (Borago officinalis L.) under weed infestation. Journal of Agroecology 6 (1): 70-83. (in Persian with English abstract).

9. Baributsa, D. N., Foster, E. F., Thelen, K., Kravchenko, D. R., and Ngouajio, M. 2008. Corn and cover crop response to corn density in an interseeding system. Agronomy Journal 100: 981-987.

10. Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., Periera, S., Rodrigues, M. L., Ricarddo, C. P., Osorio, M. L., Carvalho, I., Faria, T., and Pinheiro, C. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany 98: 907-916.

11. Daneshniaa, F., Amini, A., and Chaichi, M. R. 2016. Berseem clover quality and basil essential oil yield in intercropping system under limited Irrigation treatments with surfactant. Agricultural Water Management 164: 331-339.

12. Daneshian, J., Jonoubi, P., and Barari Tari, D. 2011. Investigation of water deficit stress on agronomical traits of soybean cultivars in temperate climate. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology 75: 778-785.

13. Egli, D. B., and Bruening, W. P. 2005. Shade and temporal distribution of pod production and set in soybean. Crop Science 45: 1764-1769.

14. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2010. Biodiversity: Agricultural biodiversity in FAO. Retrieved April 13, 2010, from http://www.fao.org/biodiversity.

15. Ghosh, P. K. 2004. Growth, yield, competition of groundnut cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research 88: 227-237.

16. Ghosh, P. K., Manna, M., Bandyopadhyay, K., Ajay, A., Tripathi, A., Wanjari, R. H., Hati, K. M., Misra, A. K., Acharya, C. L., and Subba Rao, A. 2006. Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal 98: 1097-1108.

17. Ghosh, P. K., Tripathi, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., and Manna, M. C. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy 31: 43-50.

18. Hea, H., Lei, Y., Tao, D., Neil, W., Turnerb, C., Yangc, R., Jina, Y., Xi, Y., Zhanga, C., Cui, T., Fanga, X., and Li, F. 2017. Conserved water use improves the yield performance of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under drought. Agricultural Water Management 179: 236-245.

19. Jahani, M., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2008. Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris M.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 6 (1): 67-78. (in Persian with English abstract).

20. Khajehpour, M. 2007. Principle of Agronomy. Industrial University of Esfahan Publication. (in Persian).

21. Krasova Wade, T., Diouf, O., Ndoye, I., Sall, C. E., Braconier, S., and Neyra, M. 2006. Water-condition effects on rhizobia competition for cowpea nodule occupancy. African Journal of Biotechnology 5 (16): 1457-1463.

22. Lin, C. W., Chen, Y. C., Huang, J., and Tu, T. 2007. Temporal variation of plant height, plant cover and leaf area index in intercropped area of Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology 26: 989-994.

23. Lithourgidis, A. S., Vlachostergios, D. N., Dordas, C. A., and Damalas, C. A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 287-294.

24. Maffei, M., and Mucciarelli, A. 2003. Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 84: 229-240.

25. Mahajan, S., and Toteja, N. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stress. An overview archives in biochemistry and biophysics. Annals of Botany 444: 139-458.

26. Mazaheri, D., Pasarive, S., and Peyghambari, A. 2002. Study and investigation growth analysis in monoculture and multicultural of soybean cultures. Journal of Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 54: 37-54. (in Persian with English abstract).

27. Mohsenabadi, G., Jahansooz, M. R., Chaichi, M. R., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Liaghati A. M., and Savaghebi, G. R. 2008. Evaluation of barley-vetch intercrop at different nitrogen rates. Journal of Agriculture Science Technology 10: 23-31.

28. Pour Golestani, H., Esmaeili, M., Moghadam, A., and sattarian, A. 2015. Study of pasture species in intercropping and monoculture in semi-arid of gonbade- kavous. Journal of Desert Ecosystem 8 (4): 93-102. (in Persian with English abstract).

29. Rajasekar, M., Rabert, G. A., and Manivannan, R. 2016. The effect of triazole induced photosynthetic pigments and biochemical constituents of Zea mays L. (Maize) under drought stress. Applied Nanoscience 6: 727-735.

30. Redfearn, D. D., Dwayne, R. B., and Devine, T. E. 1999. Sorghum intercropping effects on yield, morphology, and quality of forage soybean. Crop Science 39: 1380-1384.

31. Rezaei, R., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Khazaei, H. R., and Mohammad Abadi, A. 2011. Effects of planting patterns (mixed and intercropping) and millet plant density on yield and forage yield components of millet and soybean under Mashhad weather conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 9 (1): 50-59. (in Persian with English abstract).

32. Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E. 2016. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of Black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) and basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in different intercropping patterns with bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agroecology 8 (2): 263-280. (in Persian with English abstract).

33. Saghatoleslami, M., Haravan, M., Nourmohmadi, G., and Darvish, F. 2007. Effect of drought stress in growth different stages on yield and water use efficiency of five millet genotypes in South Khorasan. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 11: 215-225.

34. Sanjani, S., Hosseini, M. B., Chaichi, M. R., and Rezvan beydokhti, S. 2011. Evaluation of yield and yield components in additive intercropping of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under complete and limited irrigation conditions. Journal of Agroecology 3 (1): 25-35. (in Persian with English abstract).

35. Thomas, J., Boote, K. J., Allen, L. H., Gallo-Meagher, M., and Davis, J. M. 2003. Elevated temperature and carbon dioxide effects on soybean seed composition and transcript abundance. Crop Science 43: 1548-1557.

36. Walker, S., and Ogindo, H. O. 2003. The water budget of rainfed maize and bean intercrop. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28: 919-926.

37. Willey, R. W. 1990. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agriculture Water Management 17: 215-231.

38. Yadav, O., and Bhatnagar, S. 2001. Evaluation of indices for identification of pearl millet cultivars adapted to stress and non-stress conditions. Field Crops Research 70: 201-208.

39. Yadav, R. S., Hash, C., Bidinger, F. R., Cavan, G., and Howarth, C. 2002. Quantitative trait loci associated with traits determining grain and stove yield in pearl millet under terminal drought stress conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 67-83.

40. Yang, G., Aiwang, D., Jingsheng, S., Fusheng, L., Zugui, L., Hao, L., and Zhandong, L. 2009. Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 111 (2): 65-73.

41. Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., and Yang, W. 2014. Growth of soybean seedling in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far- red ratio. Field Crops Research 155: 245-253.

42. Yang, N., Wang, C. L., He, W. P., Qu, Y. Z., and Li. Y. S. 2016. Photosynthetic characteristics and effects of exogenous glycine of Chorispora bungeana under drought stress. Photosynthetica 54: 459-467.

43. Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., and Tsonev, T. 2003. Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 187-206.

44. Zheng, H. F., Chen, L. D., Yu, X. Y., Zhao, X. F., Ma, Y., and Ren, Z. B. 2015. Phosphorus control as an effective strategy to adapt soybean to drought at the reproductive stage: evidence from field experiments across northeast China. Soil Use and Management 31: 19-28.