ارزیابی همبستگی ویژگی‌های خاک با پارامترهای منحنی Q/I پتاسیم در خاک‌های آهکی استان لرستان

آب و خاک

مقاله 10، دوره 34، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 70، خرداد 1399، صفحه 379-391  

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jsw.v34i2.79749

نویسندگان

مریم موسی پور ؛ اکبر فرقانی؛ عاطفه صبوری

دانشگاه گیلان

چکیده

پتاسیم عنصری ضروری برای تولید محصولات کشاورزی است. برای ارزیابی وضعیت پتاسیم تبادلی و محلول در خاک از روش کمیت- شدت (Q/I) استفاده می­کنند. این تحقیق جهت به­دست آوردن شکل­های پتاسیم و منحنی­های Q/I در 16 خاک سطحی (30-0 سانتی­متری)، از خاک­های آهکی لرستان انجام شد. برای این کار از محلول کلرید کلسیم 01/0 مولار و کلرید پتاسیم با غلظت­های 33/0، 66/0، 1، 33/1، 2 و 5/2 میلی­مولار استفاده گردید. از هر نمونه، 6 سوسپانسیون تهیه و با استات آمونیوم 1 مولار خنثی عصاره­گیری ­گردید و میزان پتاسیم بوسیله دستگاه فلیم­فتومتر اندازه‌گیری شد. منحنی (Q/I) برای هر نمونه رسم گردید. نسبت فعالیت پتاسیم در حال تعادل (AR0k) بین(mmolL-1)0.5 872/0 تا 047/0، پتاسیم آسان قابل‌تبادل K0)Δ( بین (mmolkg-1) 269/1 تا 243/23، پتاسیم سخت قابل‌تبادل (KX) بین (mmolkg-1) 163/0 تا 328/16، پتاسیم قابل دسترس (KL) بین(mmolkg-1) 219/6 تا 593/38 می­باشد. بیش­ترین مقدار PBCK در خاک 11 (834/45) با درصد رس (38) و کم­ترین مقدار برای خاک 13 با مقدار (mmolkg-1)/(mmolL-1)0.5 329/23 و درصد رس (8) مشاهده گردید. بین ΔK0 و  (AR0k)همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌دار (01/0 p<،90/0=r) مشاهده گردید. PBCK با درصد رس (01/0 p<،74/0=r) و ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی خاک (01/0 p<،73/0=r) همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری نشان داد. با استفاده از روش رگرسیون چند متغیره گام به گام مشخص شد از بین تمام خصوصیات خاک، تنها مقدار رس طبق مدل آماری (631/0Clay (R2=482/0+875/17 PBCK=می­تواند بعنوان ویژگی مناسب به­منظور برآورد ظرفیت بالقوه پتاسیم خاک استفاده شود. هم­چنین طبق مدل آماری ) 318/0(R2= O.C017/9+468/14KL= مقدار کربن آلی (O.C)، بعنوان خصوصیت مناسب برای برآورد مقدار KL تعیین گردید. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

پتاسیم؛ منحنی کمیت-شدت؛ PBCK؛ Δk

مراجع

1- Abdi S., Tajabadiopur A., and Hamidpour M. 2019. Chemical Forms and Quantity-Intensity Relationships of Potassium in Rafsanjan and Anar Lands under Pistachio Trees. Journal of Pistachio Science and Technology 3(5): 22-38. (In Persian with English abstract)

2- Abtahi A.S., and Abbaslu H. 2008. Quantitative-intensity (Q/I) parameters of potassium and evaluation of correlation of its parameters with soil properties in a number of Estahban-Fars province soils. 10th Iranian soil science congress, Tehran University (Karaj), pp. 1132-1143. (In Persian with English abstract)

3- Beckett P.H.T. 1964a. Studies on soil potassium II. The immediate Q/I relations of labile potassium in the soil. Journal of Soil Science. 15: 9-23.

4- Datta D.K., and Joshi D.C. 1990. Quantity-intensity parameters of potassium and their parameter with available forms and soil properties in dune and interdune soils. Soil Science Society Indian Journal. 38: 404-409.

5- Fatemi A., Malakouti M., Bazargan K., and Honorary R. 2011. Correlation between mineral composition and quantitative-intensity parameters and available potassium in Calcareous Soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research 18(2): 23-44. (In Persian with English abstract)

6- Gawander J.S., Gangaiya P., and Morrison R.J. 2002. Potassium studies on some sugarcane growing soils in Fiji. Soil Science Society American Journal. 20: 15-21.

7- Hawkesford M., Horst W., Kichey T.M.R., Schjørring J.K., Møller I.S., and White P. 2012. Functions of macronutrients. Marschers's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants: Elsevier Science.

8- Hajizad Sh., Samadi S., Mowhaydi Nayeni S., and Charming F. 2010. Quantity-intensity parameters and forms of potassium in relation to clay mineralogy in some vineyard growing growcalcareous soils in Western Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Soil and Water Protection Research 17(3): 65-83. (In Persian with English abstract)

9- Hashemimofrad S.M., Hossinpour A., and Motaghian H.R. 2018. Determination of K quantity-intensity parameters in a topography. Journal of Soil and Water Research 24(3): 267-282. (In Persian with English abstract)

10- Helmeke P.A., and Sparks D.L. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis, part 3. Chemical methods. 2nd Ed, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin USA.

11- Hosseinpour A.R., and Kalbasi M. 2000. Potassium quantity-intensity ratio and the correlation of its parameters with soil properties in some Iranian soils. J. Sci. Techno. Agric. Nat. Res. 4: 43-55.

12- Islam A., Karim A.J.M.S., Solaiman., A.R.M., Islam Md., and Saleque Md. A. 2017. Eigh-year long potassium fertilization effects on quantity/intensity relationships of soil potassium under double rice cropping. Soil Tillage Research 169: 99-117.

13- Jimenez C., and Parra M.A. 1991. Potassium Quantity-Intensity Parameters in Calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols of Southwestern Spain. Soil Science Society American Journal .55( 4): 985-989.

14- Knudsen D., Peterson G.A., and Pratt P.F. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. P225-246, In: Page, A.L., et al., (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison. WI. USA.

15- Krishna K.R. 2002. Soil fertility and crop production. Science publisher. Inc. Endified. New Hampshire., PP. 465.

16- LeRouxe J., and Sumner M.E. 1968. Labile potassium in soils: I. Factors affecting the quantity-intensity (Q/I) parameters. Soil Science. 106: 35-41.

17- LeRoux J. 1966. Studies on ionic equilibria in Natal soils. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Natural, Republic of South Africa.

18- Lotfi Parsa H., Khademi H.Sh., Ayyubi A., and Hadiynezhad A. 2013. Time variation of potassium release from phlogopite in alfalfa root. Soil Researches (Soil and Water Sciences) 26(1): 111-112. (In Persian with English abstract)

19- Matthews B.C., and Becket P.H.T. 1962. A new procedure for studing the release and fixation of potassium ions in soil. Journal of Agriculture Science. 58: 59-64.

20- Mahmoudi Shenas M. 1395. Quantitative relationships-Severity of potassium in some calcareous soils of the Malayer vineyards. Department of Soil Science, Malayer University. (In Persian with English abstract)

21- Page A.L., 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

22- Poonia S.R., and Niederbudde E.A. 1990. Exchange equilibria of potassium in soil, V. Effect of natural organic matter on K-Ca exchange. Geoderma 47(3-4): 233-242.

23- Reynolds M., D. Bonnett S.C., Chapman R.T., Furbank Y., Manes D.E., and Parry M.A. 2011. Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 439-452.

24- Richards J.E., and Bates T.D. 1988. Studies on the potassium supplying capacities of southern Ontario: II. Nitric acid extraction of non-exchangeable K and its availability to crops. Canadian Journal soil Science. 68:199-208.

25- Samadi A. 2006. Potassium exchange isotherms as a plant availability index in selected calcareous soils of Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran. Turkish Journal Agriculture and Forest. 30(3): 213-222.

26- Samavati M., and Eskandari B. 2013. Correlation between Quantitative-Soil Potassium Soil (Q/I) parameters with some soil properties in some soils of spring city. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science 17(63): 203-213. (In Persian with English abstract)

27- Salardini A.A. 2003. Soil fertility. Tehran University Press, 410p.

28- Schouwenburg J., Van Ch., and Schuffelen A.C. 1963. Potassium-exchange behavior of an illite. Neth. Journal Agriculture Science. 11: 13-2.

29- Shaviv A., Mohsin M., Partt P F., and Mattigod S.V. 1985. Potassium fixation characteristic of five southern California soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 49: 1105-1109.

30- Sharma A., Jalali V.K., and Arora S. 2010. Non-exchangeable potassium release and its removal in foot-hill soils of North-west Himalayas. CATENA 82: 112-117.

31- Simonsson M., Andersson S., Andrist-Rangel Y., Hillier S., Mattsson L., and Öborn I. 2007. Potassium release and fixation as a function of fertilizer application rate and soil parent material. Geoderma 140: 188-198.

32- Sindhu S.S., Parmar P., and Phour M. 2014. Nutrient cycling: potassium solubilization by microorganisms and improvement of crop growth. In Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry (pp. 175-198). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

33- Sparks D.L., and Libhardt W.C. 1981. Effect of long-term lim and potassium application on quantity-intensity (Q/I) relationships in sandy soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 66: 786-986.

34- Sparks D.L., and Liebhardt W.C. 1982. Temperature effect on potassium applications on quantity-intensity (Q/I) exchenge and selectivity relationships in sandy soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 45: 786-790.

35- Strawn D.G., Bohn H.L., and OConnor G.A. 2015. Soil Chemistry. Wiley-Blackwell, 392p.

36- Stumm W., and Morgan J.J. 1996. Aquatik chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural waters. 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

37- Surapaneni A., Palmer A.S., Tillman R.W., Kirkman J.H., and Gregg P.E.H. 2002. The mineralogy and potassium supplying power of some loessial and related soils of New Zealand. Geoderma 110: 191-204.

38- Towfighi H. 1995. Kinetics potassium release from paddy soils of north of Iran. I. Comparison and evaluation of first-order, zero order and parabolic diffusion rate equations. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 26(4): 27-41.

39- Vahdati H. 2010. Correlation of some soil characteristics with Q / I curve parameters of potassium in some soils of Guilan province. Department of Soil Science, Guilan University. 100 pp. (In Persian with English abstract)

40- Wang J.J., Harrel D.L., and Bell P.F. 2004. Potassium buffering characteristcs of three soils exchangeable potassium. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 68: 654-661.

41- Wang J.J., and Scott A.D. 2001. Effect of experimental relevance on potassium Q/I relationships and its implications for surface and subsurface soils. Communication in Soil Science and plant Analysis. 32: 2561-2575.

42- Woodruff C.M. 1955. The energies of replacement of Calcium by potassium in soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 19: 36-40.

43- Zörb C., Senbayram M., and Peiter E. 2013. Potassium in agriculture– Status and perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 656-669.