- افشین، فهیمه. و استاجی، اعظم. (1390). برررسی کاربردشناختی عبارات احتیاطآمیز در مقالات علمی پژوهشی فارسی. پژوهش‌های زبانی. (۲)۲. ۱۷- ۳۶.
- دانشکار آراسته، پویان. (1381). نرمافزار تشخیص فعل در زبان فارسی. (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسی ارشد). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
- دوگانی، شادی. (1391). بررسی عبارات صوری احتیاط در هفت سوره قرآن (در چارچوب هایلند). (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسی ارشد زبانشناسی). مشهد: دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی دکتر علی شریعتیدانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
- شرفی، زهرا. (1390). بررسی کاربردشناختی عبارات احتیاطآمیز در گفتار زنان و مردان فارسیزبان. (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسی ارشد زبانشناسی). مشهد: دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی دکتر علی شریعتی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
- طباطبایی‌لطفی، سید عبدالمجید؛ قاسمی، طاهره. و سادات‌طباطبایی، مهین. (1398). مقایسه مراحل در چکیدههای مقالات رشتههای علومانسانی و پایه/ پزشکی طبق مدل دادلیایوانز. زبانپژوهی دانشگاه الزهرا، (30) 11. ۹- ۳۰.
- علوینیا، سید مجید (1390). تحلیل کاربردی عبارات احتیاطآمیز و تشدیدکننده در مناظرههای تلویزیونی ریاست جمهوری ایران و امریکا. (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسیارشد). اهواز: دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی دانشگاه شهید چمران.
- فرخ، ماندانا. (1381). بررسی ساختمان افعال ساده و مرکب فارسی و تدوین روشهای سرواژهسازی به کمک رایانه، (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسی ارشد). تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی.
- ممبینی، پگاه. (1392). بررسی عبارات موضعنما در نقد کتب مجلات: مقایسه میانرشتهای زبانشناسی کاربردی و فیزیک. (پایاننامه منتشرنشدة کارشناسی ارشد). اهواز: دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی دانشگاه شهید چمران.
- Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4, 139–145.
- Atai, M. & Sadr, L. (2008). A cross-cultural genre study on hedging devices in discussion section of applied linguistics research articles. Teaching English language and literature, 7(2), 1-22.
- Behnam, B., Naeimi, A. & Darvishzade, A. (2012). A comparative genre analysis of hedging expressions in research articles: Is fuzziness forever wicked. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 20-38.
- Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: origins, approaches, and In R. Markkanen, & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 235-249). Berlin: Werner Hildebrand.
- Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
- Dousti, M. & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2016). ELT students’ gender differences in the use of hedges in interpersonal interactions: A mixed method approach applied. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 217-231.
- Falahati, R. (2004). A contrastive study of hedging in English and Farsi academic discourse [Unpublished Master’s thesis], University of Victoria.
- Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenboeck, (Ed.), New Approaches to Hedging (pp. 13-34). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
- Gardner, D. & Davies, M. (2013). A New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics.
- Hashemi, M. R. & Shirzadi, M. (2016).The use of hedging in discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles with varied research. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS),35(1), 31-56.
- Hassani, M. T. & Dastjani Farahani, M. (2016). A discourse analysis of gender differences in the use of hedging devices in applied linguistics research articles. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 59-73.
- Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Teaching, 18, 33-42.
- Hyland, K. (1996a). Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433- 453.
- Hyland, K. (1996b). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedges in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-28.
- Hyland, K. (1998a). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins: Amesterdam.
- Hyland, K. (1998b). Boosting, hedging and negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18(3), 349- 382.
- Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic writing texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179- 197.
- Hyland, K. & Tse, P. M. (2004). Meta discourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
- Jadidinejad, A. H., Mahmoudi, F. & Dehdari, J. (2010). Evaluation of PerStem: A simple and efficient stemming algorithm for Persian, in workshop of the cross-language evaluation forum for European languages. Springer, 98-101.
- Jalilifar, A. (2006). All the way through the hedges: A corpus analysis of hedges in research articles. Paper presented at 7th Iranian conference on linguistics, Tehran, Iran.
- Jalilifar, A. (2007). Hedging as a pragmatic strategy: Variations across disciplines and cultures. TELL, 1(3), 43-69.
- Khallash, M. & Imany, M. (2014). Hazm: Python library for digesting Persian text. [cited 2015; Available from: https://github.com/sobhe/hazm.
- Kong, C. C. K. (2006). Linguistic resources as evaluators in English and Chinese research articles. Multi lingua, 25, 183–216.
- Manshadi, M. (2015). Farsi Verb Tokenizer. [cited 2015; Available from: https://github.com/mehdi-manshadi/Farsi-Verb-Tokenizer.
- Marti´n, P. & Burgess, S. (2004). The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts. Text, 24, 171–195.
- Millan, E. L. (2008). Epistemic and approximative meaning revisited: The use of hedges, boosters, and approximators when writing research in different disciplines. In S. Burgess, P. Marti´n-Marti´n. (Eds.), English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication ( 65–82). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
- Sahragard, R. & Yazdanpanahi, S. (2017). English engagement markers: A comparison of humanities and science journal articles. Language Art, 2(1), 111-130.
- Soodmand Afshar, H., Moradi, M. & Hamzavi, R. (2014). Frequency and type of hedging devices used in the research articles of humanities, basic sciences and agriculture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 70-74.
- Sarabi, Z., Mahyar, H. & Farhoodi, M. (2013). ParsiPardaz: Persian language processing toolkit. Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), 3rd International Conference on IEEE, Mashhad, Iran.
- Rezaie, M. & Takii, S. (2014). Hedging expressions in English and Persian MA and PhD theses: The case of Iranian learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2339- 2349.
- Samaie, M., Khosravian, F. & Boghayeri, M. (2014). The frequency and types of hedges in research article introductions by Persian and English native authors. Science Direct, 98, 1678 – 1685. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.593
- Salager Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2): 149- 170.
- Salager Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional approaches to written texts: Classroom applications (pp. 127–143). Washington: ERIC.
- Sedaghat, A., Biria, R. & Asadi A.Y. (2015). Cross cultural analysis of hedges in Persian and English editorial columns. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 8(1), 37-50.
- Seraji, M., Megyesi, B. & Nivre, J. (2012). A basic language resource kit for Persian. Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), European Language Resources Association. Istanbul, Turkey.
- Shamsfard, M. (2011). Challenges and open problems, Persian text processing. 5th Language & Technology Conference (LTC),
- Shamsfard, M., Jafari, H. S., & Ilbeygi, M. (2010). STeP-1: A set of fundamental tools for Persian text processing. Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), European Language Resources Association. Istanbul, Turkey.
- Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse. Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience.
- Vold, T. E. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61-87.
|
