تبیین نقش زمینه و معماری سازمانی بر توسعه دوسوتوانی فردی در شرکت های دانش بنیان

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25، شهریور 1400، صفحه 1-22   

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/tmj.2021.30393.0

نویسندگان

رؤیا شاکری^{* 1}؛ حسین رحمان سرشت²؛ سوران مولایی³؛ مهدی عبدالملکی⁴

¹دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران

²استاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

³دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

⁴مدرس دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

هدف مقاله حاضر تبیین نقش زمینه و معماری سازمانی در توسعه دوسوتوانی فردی در شرکت­های دانش‌بنیان فعال در شهر سنندج در سال 1398 است. ازنظر روش­شناسی، پژوهش حاضر از نوع پیمایشی - کاربردی بوده و مبتنی بر روش­های توصیفی- زمینه­یابی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل تمامی 303 نفر مدیران ارشد و کارشناسان شرکت­های دانش‌بنیان فعال مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری شهر سنندج است. حجم نمونه با توجه به محدود بودن جامعه، برحسب فرمول کوکران برابر با 170 نفر محاسبه و اِعمال شد. داده­های موردنیاز از طریق ترکیب و تجمیع چندین پرسشنامه استاندارد با ملحوظ کردن اصلاحات صوری جمع‌آوری‌شده است. اعتبار محتوای عوامل احصاء­شده با نظر خبرگان و سپس اعتبار سازه آزمون با استفاده از روش­های تحلیل عاملی تأیید شد. به‌منظور تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات جمع‌آوری‌شده از مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است. نتایج بیان­گر تأیید تمامی فرضیه­های پژوهش و تأثیر مثبت و معنی­داری زمینه و معماری سازمانی بر توسعه دوسوتوانی فردی در جامعه آماری موردمطالعه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

زمینه سازمانی؛ معماری سازمانی؛ دوسوتوانی فردی؛ شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان؛ سنندج

سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله

NO.25-Extended abstract.pdf

مراجع

References

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation, Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.

Baker, T.; Hunt, T., & Hawes, J. (1999). Marketing strategy and organizational culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(2), 32–46.

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.

Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287–298.

Birkinshaw, J.; Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives, California Management Review, 58(4), 36–58.

Blindenbach-Driessen, F., & Van Den Ende, J. (2014). The locus of innovation: the effect of a separate innovation unit on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity in manufacturing and service firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1089–1105.

Brattström, A.; Löfsten, H., & Richtnér, A. (2015). Similar, yet different: a comparative analysis of the role of trust in radical and incremental product innovation, International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(04), 135-143.

Ebrahimpour, M.; Mostafa, M., & Hosmand, M. (2015). The effect of innovation ambidexterity on export knowledge and performance of new products in export markets, Journal of Science & Technology Parks and Incubators, 11(42), 49-56. (in Persian)

Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality of management, Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91–112.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A Little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes, Journal of Management, 30(4), 453–470.

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496.

Haghighi, M.; Dehghani Soltani, M., & Farsizadeh, H. (2017). Explaining the role of organizational ambidexterity in the impact of pro-innovation culture and organizational memory on new product development performance, Public Management Researches, 10(38), 197-223. (in Persian)

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.

Huang, J., & Kim, H. J. (2013). Conceptualizing structural ambidexterity into the innovation of human resource management architecture: the case of LG electronics, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(5), 922–943.

 Jansen, J. J. P.; Tempelaar, M. P.; Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms, Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811.

Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance, Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.

Justin, J. P.; Jansen, P.; Tempelaar, J.; Van den, B., & Henk, W. (2008). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms, Organization Science, 20(4), 1-15.

Junni, P.; Sarala, R.; Taras, V., Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: a meta- analysis, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.

Kammerlander, N.; Burger, D.; Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. (2015). Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus, Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 582–602.

Lavie, D.; Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155.

Lin, Z.; Yang, H., & Demirkan, I. (2007). The Performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: empirical investigation and computational theorizing, Management Science, 53(10), 1645–1658.

Lubatkin, M. H.; Simsek, Z.; Ling, Y.; & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

Manteghei, M.; Taghizadeh, M.; Safardoost, A., & Rozesara, M. (2015). Analysis of organizational ambidexterity role in spin off's creation growth and success, Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 13(26), 17-28. (in Persian)

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

Martín-de, G.; Delgado-Verde, M.; Navas-López, J. E., & Cruz-González, J. (2013). The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation technol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 351–363.

Maslach, D. (2016). Change and persistence with failed technological innovation, Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 714-723.

McCarthy, I. P., & Gordon, B. R. (2011). Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: a management control system approach, R&D Management, 41(3), 240–258.

Miller, K. D.; Zhao, M., & Calantone, R. J. (2006). Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to march’s exploration-exploitation model, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 709–722.

mom, t. j. m.; fourné, s. p. l., & jansen, j. j. p. (2015). managers’ work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: the contingency role of the work context, Human Resource Management, 54(S1), 133–153.

Mom, T. J. M.; Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: the influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows, Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931.

Mom, T. J. M.; Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms, Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828.

Moradi, M.; Ebrahimpour, M., & Mombaine, M. (2013). Explaining organizational ambidexterity as a new concept in the management of knowledge based organizations, Journal of Science & Technology Parks and Incubators, 10(40), 49-56. (in Persian)

Moradi, M.; Yakideh, K., & Madani, F. (2016). Organizational culture ambidexterity and performance: the critical role of organizational ambidexterity, Organizational Culture Management, 13(4), 1245-1266. (in Persian)

Nagarajan, P. (2010). Enterprise architecture ontology: a shared vocabulary for efficient decision making for software development organizations. master thesis. the ohio state university, Ohio.

Nightingale, D., & Rhodes, D. (2004). Enterprise systems architecting: emerging art and science within engineering systems, MIT Engineering Systems, 8(3), 45–63.

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 185–206.

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.

Pourteymour, F., & Jamshidi, L. (2015). Investigate the innovative performance through emerging knowledge-based companies in Semnan University Incubator', Journal on Industry and University, 7(23), 37-52. (in Persian)

Prabhu, J. C.; Chandy, R. K., & Ellis, M. E. (2005). The Impact of acquisitions on innovation: poison pill, placebo, or tonic, Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 114–130.

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators, Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.

Raisch, S.; Birkinshaw, J.; Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance, Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

Schultz, C.; Schreyoegg, J., & Von Reitzenstein, C. (2013). The moderating role of internal and external resources on the performance effect of multitasking: Evidence from the R&D performance of surgeons, Research Policy, 42(8), 1356–1365.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624.

Simsek, Z.; Heavey, C.; Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.

Sitkin, S. B.; See, K. E.; Miller, C. C.; Lawless, M. W., & Carton, A. M. (2011). The Paradox of stretch goals: organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible, Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 544–566.

Spisak, B. R.; Grabo, A. E.; Arvey, R. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The age of exploration and exploitation: younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability, The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 805-816.

Srivastava, A.; Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering Leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.

Stadler, C., Rajwani, T., & Karaba, F. (2014). Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: networks as a new level of analysis, International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 172–193.

Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.

Tuncdogan, A.; Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2015). Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leader's exploration and exploitation activities, The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 838–850.

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

Yadollahi Farsi, J.; Zarea H., & Hejazi, S. R. (2012). Identifying effective ambidexture’s components on commercialization of academic research in universities, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 18(1), 69-90. (in Persian)

Zandi, F., & Tavana, M. (2012). A fuzzy group multi-criteria ea framework selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 1165-1173.