شناسایی تأثیر ویژگی‌های فردی بر رفتارهای دوسوتوانی زمینه‌ای کارکنان

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 26، اسفند 1400، صفحه 1-18  

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/tmj.2022.31049.0

نویسندگان

کمال سخدری ¹؛ حسن عابدینی²

¹دانشیار دانشگاه تهران

²کارشناس ارشد کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

چکیده
با وجود افزایش مطالعات دوسوتوانی سازمانی، کشف فرصت‌های جدید، هم‌زمان با بهره‌برداری از صلاحیت‌های موجود، دانش اندکی در مورد عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری رفتارهای دوسوتوانی کارکنان وجود دارد. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی رابطه گرایش کارآفرینانه فردی کارکنان (با ابعاد تمایل به نوآوری، ریسک‌پذیری و پیش‌گامی) و اخلاق‌گرایی با دوسوتوانی زمینه‌ای فردی می‌پردازد. این تحقیق از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ روش گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی است. داده‌ها بر اساس پرسشنامه از 203 نفر از کارکنان کسب‌وکارهای حوزه صنایع غذایی در شهر تهران جمع‌آوری و با نرم‌افزار SmartPLS تحلیل شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که گرایش کارآفرینانه و اخلاق‌گرایی، دوسوتوانی فردی را افزایش می‌دهد، اما تأثیر تعدیل‌گر اخلاق‌گرایی بر رابطه بین گرایش کارآفرینانه و دوسوتوانی فردی تأیید نشد. این نتایج نشان داد که رفتارهای اکتشافی حین انجام وظایف روزمره را از کارکنانی می‌توان انتظار داشت که دارای گرایش کارآفرینانه و اخلاق‌گرایی بیشتری هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

دوسوتوانی زمینه ای؛ گرایش کارآفرینانه؛ اخلاق گرایی؛ اکتشاف؛ بهره برداری

سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله

NO.26-Extended abstract.pdf

مراجع

References

Burgers, J. H., & Covin, J. G. (2016). The contingent effects of differentiation and integration on corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 521-540.

Chang, Y. Y.; Chang, C. Y.; Chen, C. W.; Chen, Y. C. K., & Chang, S. Y. (2019). Firm-level participative leadership and individual-level employee ambidexterity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. doi/10.1108/LODJ-08-2018-0308/full/html

Chang, S.; Lin, R.; Chang, F., & Chen, R. (2007). Achieving manufacturing flexibility through entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(7), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710816711

Cong, C.; Dempsey, M., & Xie, H. M. (2017). Political skill, entrepreneurial orientation and organizational justice. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2015-0103

Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x.

Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship (Vol. 5). New York: Springer.

Fang, C.; Lee, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21(3), 625-642.

Fang, N.; Yuli, Z., & Hongzhi, X. (2008). Acquisition of resources, formal organization and entrepreneurial orientation of new ventures. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561390910916877.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Geerts, A. (2010). Acheiveing a balance between exploration and exploitation in service firms: a longitudinal study. Academy of Management, (1), 1–6.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

Goossen, M. C., & Bazzazian, N. (2012). Consistently capricious: the performance effects of simultaneous and sequential ambidexterity. Unpublished Paper Presented at DRUID Academy, 35.

Gupta, A. K.; Smith, K. G.; Shalley, C. E.; Smith, K. E. N. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.

Güttel, W. H., & Konlechner, S. W. (2009). Continuously hanging by a thread: Managing contextually ambidextrous organizations. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61(2), 150-172.

Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Ready or not: How do we accelerate the developmental readiness of leaders? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1181-1187.

Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1899–1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312445925

Junni, P.; Sarala, R. M.; Taras, V. a S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational Ambiexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. The Academy of Management Perspective, 27(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015.

Karimi, A., & Rahmani, S. (2014). The impact of entrepreneurial tendency on the performance of businesses by mediation of the knowledge creation process (case study: small and medium businesses), Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 5 (3), 143-171. (in Persian)

Koryak, O.; Lockett, A.; Hayton, J.; Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413-427.

Li, Y. H., & Huang, J. W. (2012). Ambidexterity’s mediating impact on product development proficiency and new product performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1125–1132.

 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.05.002

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

Miao, C.; Coombs, J. E.; Qian, S., & Sirmon, D. G. (2017). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation: a meta-analysis of resource orchestration and cultural contingencies. Journal of Business Research, 77, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.016

Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms author (s): danny miller published by : informs stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2630968, 29(7), 770–791.

Moradi, M.; Ebrahimpour, M., & Membini, Y. (2014). Explaining organizational dualism as a new concept in the management of student organizations. Journal of Technological Development, 10 (40), 27-18. (in Persian).

Morris, M. H.; Coombes, S.; Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of entrepreneurial and market orientations in a non-profit context: theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 12–39.

 https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130040401

Pittino, D.; Visintin, F., & Lauto, G. (2017). A configurational analysis of the antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation. European Management Journal, 35(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.07.003.

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.

Raisch, S.; Birkinshaw, J.; Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.

Sakhdari, K.; Burgers, H.; Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Rostamnezhad, S. (2020). Shaping the organisational context for corporate entrepreneurship and performance in Iran: the interplay between social context and performance management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(8), 1020-1046.

Shimizu, K. (2012). Risks of corporate entrepreneurship: Autonomy and agency issues. Organization Science, 23(1), 194-206.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624.

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852

Vrontis, D.; Thrassou, A.; Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388.

Wales, W.; Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 895–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750316669906.

Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and C hinese high‐tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76.

Yadolahi Farsi, J. (2014). Identify the two-component components that affect the business performance of academic research. Journal of Higher Education Research and Planning, 63, 90-69. (in Persian).

Zehir, C.; Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.381

Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: evidence from china. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(2), 293–317.

 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00359.x

 Zimmermann, A.; Hill, S. A.; Birkinshaw, J., & Jaeckel, M. (2019). Complements or substitutes? a microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning, 101927.