اثر شدت هرس و تعداد جوانه در هر شاخه بر عملکرد و کیفیت انگور ’رطبی‘

علوم باغبانی

مقاله 4، دوره 37، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 59، آبان 1402، صفحه 629-641   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jhs.2022.74612.1125

نویسنده

محمدجواد کرمی^*

استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی فارس. سازمان تحقیقات ،آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی

چکیده

انگور یکی از محصولات مهم و غالب باغی استان فارس و انگور ’رطبی‘ یکی از رقم­های مهم انگور آبی در این استان است. دو روش هرس در انگور وجود دارد (هرس بلند و هرس کوتاه). تفاوت این دو روش هرس، در طول شاخه یک ساله نگهداری شده پس از انجام هرس است. در هرس بلند شاخه­های با بیش از سه جوانه اما در هرس کوتاه شاخه­های کوتاه دو تا سه جوانه­ای نگهداری می­شود. به منظور تعیین شدت هرس مناسب، واکنش این رقم به دو سطح شدت هرس (سبک با فرمول 20+40 و شدید با فرمول 20+20) و سه سطح تعداد جوانه در هر نقطه بارده (3، 6 و 9 جوانه‌ای) به مدت سه سال با  آزمایش فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در شیراز بررسی گردید. نتایج نشان داد که اثر متقابل شدت هرس × طول شاخه بارده بر ویژگی­های تعداد خوشه، وزن و تعداد حبه (p≤0.01) و بر ویژگی میانگین عملکرد و مقدار اسید میوه (p≤0.05) معنی‌دار بود. هم‌چنین اثر شدت هرس بر عملکرد، تعداد خوشه و وزن حبه و اثر تعداد جوانه در هر شاخه بارده بر عملکرد، تعداد خوشه و تعداد حبه معنی‌دار بود. بیشترین عملکرد در هرس سبک با شاخه­های شش جوانه­ای (9/34 تن در هکتار) و نه جوانه­ای (1/33 تن در هکتار) بدست آمد. بیشترین تعداد خوشه (126 خوشه در هر کرت) در هرس سبک با شاخه نه جوانه­ای، سنگین­ترین حبه­ها (7/5 گرم) در هرس شدید با شاخه شش جوانه­ای و بیشترین تعداد حبه (126 عدد) در هرس شدید با شاخه سه جوانه­ای مشاهده شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

باردهی جوانه؛ تربیت تاک؛ هرس تعادلی؛ هرس سبک

مراجع

 

1. Ahmad, W., Junaid, M., Nafees, M., Farooq, M., & Saleem, B.A. (2004). Effects of pruning severity on growth behavior of spur and bunch morphology of grapes (Vitis vinifera) cv. Perlette. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 160-161.
2. Ahmad, M.F. (2008). Influence of pruning severity on yield and quality of Himrod grape under Kashmir conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 65(1), 16-19.
3. Ahmadi, K., Ebadzade, H.R., AbdeShah, H., Kazemian, A., & Rafiei, M. (2018). Agricultural Statistics 2016-2017. Volume III, Horticultural Products. Ministry of Jihad Agriculture (Iran), Deputy of Planning and Economy, Technology and Information and Communication Center, 235 pages.
4. Ahmedullah, M., & Himelric, D.C. (1989). Grape management. p. 383-471. In Galleta, G. J., and Himelric, D.C. (eds.). Small Fruit Crop Management. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs . New Jersey. U.S.A.
5. Andreini, L., Viti, R., & Scalabrelli, G. (2009). Study on the morphological evolution of bud break in Vitis vinifera Vitis, 48, 153-158.
6. (1983). Descriptors for Grape. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Executive Secretariat, via dell Terme, Dicaraculia, Rome, Italy.
7. (2006). Annual report 2005-06, National Research Center for Grapes, Pune. 19-20.
8. Archer, E., & van Schalkwyk, D. (2007). The effect of alternative pruning methods on the viticultural and oenological performance of some wine grape varieties. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 28(2), 107-139.
9. Avenant, J.H. (1998). The effect of pruning levels on the performance of Festival Seedless. Deciduous Fruit Grower, 48(5), 7-13.
10. Baeza, P., Ruiz, C., Cuevas. E., Sotes V., & Lissarrague, J.R. (2005), Ecophysiological and agronomic response of Tempranillo grapevines to four training system. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2005.56.2.129
11. Bordelon Bruce, P., Skinkis Patricia, A., & Howard, P.H. (2008). Impact of training system on vine performance and Fruit Composition of Traminette. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59(1), 39-46.
12. Botelho, RV., Pires, E.J.P., & Terra, M.M. (2009). Fertilidade de gemas em videiras: fisiologia e fatores envolvidos. Ambiência, 2, 129-144.
13. Brighenti, A.F., Cipriani, R., Malinovski, L.I., Vanderlinde, G., Allebrandt, R., Feldberg, N.P., & Silva, A.L. (2017). Ecophysiology of three Italian cultivars subjected to two pruning methods in Santa Catarina, Acta Horticulturae, 1157, 381-388. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1157.53
14. Chalak, S.U. (2008). Effect of different levels of pruning on various wine grape varieties for yield and quality. M.Sc., Thesis submitted to MPKV, Rahuri..
15. Dry, P.R. (2004). What is vine balance. Abstract and oral presentation. 12th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, 24-29 July, Melbourne, Victoria. pp. 19.
16. Evans, R.G. (2000). The art of protecting grapevines from low temperature injury. Proceedings of ASEV 50^th Anniversary Annual Meeting, Seattle WA. June 19-23, pages 60-72.
17. Feza Ahmad, M. (2008). Influence of pruning severity on yield and quality of Himrod grape under Kashmir conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 65(1), 16-19.
18. Creasy, G.L., & Greasy, L.L. (2018). Grape. 2nd edition. CAB International. USA, 380 p.
19. Havinal, M.H. (2007). Screening of wine grape varieties for growth, yield and fruit quality parameters. M.Sc., Thesis submitted to MPKV, Rahuri .
20. Janick, J. (1994). Horticultural review, volume 16. New concepts in pruning of grapevines. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: USA.
21. Karami, F., Karami, M.J., Ahmadi, H., & Rostami A. (2007). Effect of pruning severity and cane length on yield and quality of non-irrigated Rasheh and Khoshnav grape cvs. Page 639 in Proceedings of the 5^th Iranian Horticultural Sciences Congress. 3-6 september. Shiraz-Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)
22. Karami, M.J. (2010). Effect of pruning severity and bud number per bearing unit on yield and yield component of rainfed grape cv. Shirazi. Seed and Plant, 26(2), 57-67. (In Persian with English abstract)
23. Karami, M.J. (2011). Effect of pruning severity and cane length on yield and quality of grape cv. Siah –e - Samarghandi. Seed and Plant, 26(4), 445-456. (In Persian with English abstract)
24. Karami, M.J. (2013a). Characteristics of white grape cultivar of Fars province, Iran. Seed and Plant, 28-1(3), 353-381. (In Persian with English abstract)
25. Karami, M.J. (2013b). Late budbreak grape cultivars selection to avoid from spring frost damage. Smal Fruit Journal, 2(4), 73-88. (In Persian with English abstract)
26. Keller, M. (2015). The science of grapevine: anatomy and physiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. UK.
27. kohale, V.S., kulkarni, S.S., Ranpise, S.A., & Garad, B.V. (2013). Effect of pruning on fruiting of Sharad Seedless grapes. Bioinfolet, 10(1B), 300-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.3.1.06
28. Kumar, A.R., Parthiban, S., Subbiah, A., & Sangeeta, V. (2017). Effect of severity of pruning on yield and quality characters of grapes (Vitis vinifera ): A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 818-835.
29. Landolt, J. (2011). Effects of pruning level and canopy management practices on berry maturation rate and harvest parameters of Syrah wine grapes. Master thesis, Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
30. Leão, P.C.S., & Silva, E.E.G. (2003). Brotação e fertilidade de gemas em uvas sem sementes no Vale do São Francisco. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 25, 375-378.
31. Loubser, F.H. (2008). Chenin blanc table wine in South Africa. Cape Wine Master Dissertation, 86p.
32. Meneguzzi, A., Marcon Filho, J.L., Brighenti, A.F., Andre Wurz, D., Rufato, L., & da Silv, A.L. (2020). Fertility of buds and pruning recommendation of different grapevine varieties grown in altitude regions of Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Revista Ceres, 67, 30–34.
33. Moeinrad, H. (2007). Buds fruitfulness position on canes of soltanni, Askari and Shahroodi (Vitis vinifera L.) grape cultivars. Page 631 in Proceedings of the 5^th Iranian Horticultural Sciences Congress. 3-6 september. Shiraz-Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)
34. O’Daniel, S.B., Archbold, D.D., & Kurtural, S.K. (2012). Effects of balanced pruning severity on traminette (Vitis) in a warm climate. American Society for Enology and Viticulture, 63(2), 284-290.
35. Palanichamy, V., Jindal, P.C., & Singh, R. (2004). Studies on severity of pruning in grapes (Vitis vinifera) var. Pusa Navrang–A teinturier hybrid. Agricultural Science Digest, 24(2), 145–147.
36. Pirayesh-Baigbaghi, A., Fatahi, H., & Karbalaei-Khiavy, H. (2007). Effects of pruning severity (as buds number) and cane thickness on yield and quality of Meshkinshahr Kishmishi grape cultivar. Page 633 in Proceedings of the 5^th Iranian Horticultural Sciences Congress. 3-6 september. Shiraz-Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)
37. Popescu, C. (2012). Influence of bud load for two Romanian table grape cultivars in the climatic conditions of Stefanesti vineyard. Scientific Papers-Series B, Horticulture, 56, 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017332
38. Power, R., Schlosser, J., & Reynolds, A.G. (2000). Magnitude of influence between canopy manipulation and enological practices upon Chardonnay musque monoterpenes and wine sensory attributes. Presented at: 25^th Annual meeting, American Society for Enology and Viticulture, Estern Section, Ithaca, NY, July 19-20.
39. Senthilkumar, S, Vijayakumar, R.M, Soorianathasundaram, K., & Devi D.D. (2015). Effect of pruning severity on vegetative, physiological, yield & quality attributes in grape (Vitis Vinifera) - A Review Current Agriculture Research Journal, 3(1), 42-54.
40. Somkuwar, R.G., & Ramteke, S.D. (2006). Yield and quality in relation to different crop loads on Tas-A-Ganesh table grapes (Vitis vinifera). Journal of Plant Sciences, 1(2), 176-181. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2006.176.181
41. Somkuwar, R.G., & Ramteke, S.D. (2007). Effect of bunch retention, quality and yield in Sharad Seedless. Annual Report 2006-07, National Research Center for Grapes, Pune. 20.
42. Sorokowsky, D., Schlosser, J., & Reynolds, A.G. (2000). Relative impact of thinning time and enological treatments on Chardonnay musque monoterpenes and wine sensory attributes. Presented at: 25^th Meeting, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture., Estern Section, Ithaca, NY, July 19-20.
43. Striegler, R.k., Morris, J.R., Main, G.L., Lake, C.B., & Graves, S.R. (2000). Threlfall, R.T. and Blevins, J.M. Effect of pruning method on yield and quality of ‘Sunbelt’ grapes grown in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Horticultural Science, 35(3), 439.
44. Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2009). Fisiologia Vegetal. 4ª ed. Porto Alegre, Artmed. 848p.
45. Terence, B. (2008). Pruning level affects growth and yield of New York Concord on two training systems. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59(3), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2008.59.3.276
46. Tassie, E., & Freeman, B.M. (2001). Pruning. In: ‘Viticulture Volume 2, Practices’. (Eds BG Coombe and PR Dry) Winetitles, Adelaide, pp. 66-84.
47. Velu, V. (2001). Studies on bud load and certain crop thinning practices on vigour, yield and quality of grapes(Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Muscat.Sc.,(Hort.) Thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
48. Zoecklein, B.W., Wolf, T.K., Pélanne, L., Miller, M.K., & Birkenmaier, S. (2008). Effect of vertical shoot- positioned, smart-Dyson, and Geneva double- Curtain training systems on Viognier grape and wine composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59(1), 11-21.