Evaluation of Photosystem II Activity in Two Almond Genotypes under Drought Stress by Exploring the OJIP Test

علوم باغبانی

Article 2, Volume 37, Issue 4 - Serial Number 60, January 2024, Pages 901-914   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhs.2023.75794.1150

Authors

M. Fattahi^{* 1}; Sh. Pourmoghadam²

¹Department of Agriculture Science, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran

²Department of Agriculture, University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
 Almond (Prunus amygdalus) is considered to be able to tolerate drought stress fairly well during all stages of growth. Water shortages are very frequent in many countries, and, together with the rising demand for the industry, the growth of the human population, climate change and specifically the trend towards irrigated agriculture, have led to widespread problems of water scarcity in most countries. Plant responses to water deprivation are usually monitored through selected morphological and physiological parameters which have been proven to be good indicators of drought in different studies. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence, produced by the Chl a molecule after excitation by light, is a non-invasive and rapid biomarker for the assessment of stress (microbial and environmental) effects on PSII, as well as its structure and function. Fluorescence induction patterns and derived indices have been used as empirical diagnostic tools in stress physiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in two almond genotypes. It is known that the kinetics of fluorescence transients are polyphasic when plotted on a logarithmic time scale labeled as OJIP. This curve rises from an initial low-value F0 (minimal fluorescence) to FJ (fluorescence value at 2 ms) and FI (fluorescence value at about 20–30 ms) and a peak of fluorescence FP (maximal fluorescence or Fm).
Materials and Methods
 The Experiment was carried out under a completely randomized design with split arrangement having three replications. Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were determined by the method of Lichtenthaler (1986). Fresh leaves (1 g) were triturated in 80% acetone. The absorbance of the extracts was measured at 645, 663, and 470 nm using a spectrophotometer. Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured 40 days after the start of drought treatment. Full expanded leaves were selected from each plant for measurements. They were measured with a portable photosynthetic efficiency analyzer model (Hansatech, United Kingdom). Calculations were made with computer-assisted analysis using the SPSS 25 software.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the maximum total fresh and dry mass was recorded in the Mamaei cultivar. The drought stress caused a significant reduction in a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids in Rabie (R) as well as Mamaei (M) cultivars but in general, M plants had higher content of pigments in comparison with R plants under drought stress. In both of cultivars, the potential efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) was reduced with an increasing drought intensity. The reduction of Fv/Fm was accompanied by a decline in Fv and Fm. The VJ, relative variable fluorescence at J step (2 ms), was increased with increase in drought levels. Plants response to drought depends on PSII ability to respond to this stress. It has been reported that water limitation reduces the quantum yield of PSII electron transport, which in turn decreases the amount of light energy reaching the reaction centers. PSII plays a pivotal role in mediating oxygen evolution activity. In our study, we observed an interaction between cultivar and drought treatment, particularly evident in parameters such as Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm, and PI. Additionally, our findings revealed a robust correlation between the Pi index and total chlorophyll content (0.647), as well as the fresh (0.685) and dry (0.695) weight of plants. Furthermore, our results indicate that drought stress significantly impairs the growth of cultivars grafted on GN15 rootstock. This may be the outcome of the inhibition of water shortage on the photosynthetic apparatus. The results discovered that carotenoids were higher in M cultivar than R cultivar, carotenoids protect the photosynthetic apparatus from photooxidative damage. Protection is afforded by quenching of the triplet state of chlorophyll, thereby preventing the formation of harmful oxidative species. We also found the performance index is the parameter that better reflects the responses of the studied cultivars to progressive drought stress.
Conclusion
We applied chlorophyll fluorescence as a biomarker to assess the growth response and PSII behavior and performance of two almond cultivars to different drought levels. In conclusion, Mamaei was less affected by drought stress in terms of total Chl, Fv/Fm, PI, and total fresh and dry weight followed by Rabie. Differential responses among cultivars under drought stress treatments were observed regarding their capacity to induce PSII activity. Parameters derived from the JIP test proved effective in characterizing the degree of response to drought stress, with PI serving as a particularly responsive multi-parametric expression.

Keywords

Chlorophyll; Correlation; Dehydration; Fluorescence

References

1. Ali, M.A., Jabran, K., Awan, S.I., Abbas, A., Zulkiffal, E.M., Acet, T., Farooq, J., & Rehman, A. (2011). Morphophysiological diversity and its implications for improving drought tolerance in grain sorghum at different growth stages. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 311-320.
2. Apostolova, E.L., Dobrikova, A.G., Ivanova, P.I., & Petkanchin, I.B. (2006). Relationship between the organization of the supercomplex and functions of the photosynthetic apparatus. Journal Photochemistry Photobiology Biology, 83(2), 114-122.
3. Bacelar, E.A., Santos, D.L., Jose, M.M.P., Goncalves, B.C., Ferreira, H.F., & Correia, C.M. (2006). Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: changes on structure and chemical composition of foliage and oxidative damage. Plant Science, 170, 596–605.
4. Baker, N.R., & Rosenqvist, E. (2004). Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(403), 1607-1621.
5. Baker, N.R. (1991). A possible role for photosystem II in environmental perturbation of photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 81, 563-570.
6. Barzegar, K., Yadollahi, A., Imani, A., & Ahmadi, N. (2012). Response to drought stress of almond cultivars and genotypes grown under field conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Research and Review, 2, 205-210.
7. Cirio, U. (1997). Agrochemicals and environmental impact in olives farming. Olivea, 65, 32-39.
8. Fathi, H., Amiri, M.E., Imani, A., Hajilou, J., & Nikbakht, J. (2017). Response of almond genotypes/cultivars grafted on GN15 “Garnem” rootstock in deficitirrigation stress conditions. Journal of Nuts, 8, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.22034/jon.2017.536243
9. Fathi, H., Eimani, A., Amiri, E., Hajilo, J., & Nikbakht, J. (2019). Growth and biochemical responses of some GN15-Rootstock almond genotypes to low irrigation stress. Plant Process and Function, 8, 29. In Persian
10. Hassani, Z., Pirdashti, H., Yaghobian, Y., & Nori, M.Z. (2014). Application of chlorophyll fluorescence technique to evaluate the tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes to cold temperature and water stresses. Journal of Cell & Tissue (JCT) Original Article Summer, 5(2), 195-206. (In Persian)
11. Hu, W.H., Zhou, Y.H., Du, Y.S., & Xia, X.J. (2006). Differential response of photosynthesis in greenhouse and field ecotypes of tomato to long-term chilling under low light. Journal Plant Physiology, 163, 1236-1246.
12. Hussain, M., Malik, M.A., Farooq, M., Ashraf, M.Y., & Cheema, A. (2008). Improving drought 11 tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 194, 193–199.
13. Hussain, M., Malik, M.A., Ashraf, M.Y., & Cheema, A. (2009). Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184, 173–179.
14. Jimenez, S., Fattahi, M., Bedis, K., Nasrolahpour-moghadam, S., Irigoyen, J.J., & Gogorcena, Y. (2020). Interactional effects of climate change factors on the water status, photosynthetic rate, and metabolic regulation in peach. Frontier Plant Science, 11, 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00043
15. Karimi, S., Yadollahi, A., Arzani, K., Imani, A., & Aghaalikhani, M. (2015). Gas- exchange response of almond genotypes to water stress. Photosynthetica, 53, 29-34.
16. Levitt, J. (1980). Responses of plants to environmental stresses, Volume II: Water, radiation, salt and other stresses. Academic Press, New York, 479 p.
17. Li, G.M., Liu, B.B., Wu, Y., & Zou, Z.R. (2008). Interactive effects of drought stresses and elevated CO₂ concentration on photochemistry efficiency of cucumber seedlings. Journal of Integrity Plant Biology, 50(10), 1307-1317.
18. Li, X.G., Duan, W., Meng, Q.W., & Zou, Q. (2004). The function of chloroplastic NAD(P)H dehydrogenase in tobacco during chilling stress under low irradiance. Plant Cell Physiology, 45(1), 103-108.
19. Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, Methods Enzymology, 148, 350–382.
20. Mehata, P., Jajoo, A., Mathur, S., & Bharti, S. (2010). Chlorophyll a fluorescence study revealing effects of high salt stress on photosystem II in wheat leaves. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(1), 16-20.
21. Parvaiz, A., & Satyawati, S. (2008). Salt stress and Phyto-biochemical responses of plants. Plant Soil Environment, 54, 89-99.
22. Pereira, W.E., Siqueira, D.L., & Martínez, C.A. (2000). Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in four Citrus rootstocks under aluminium stress. Plant Physiology, 157, 513–520.
23. Pstrasser, R.J., Srivastava, A., & Tsimilli-Michael, M. (2001). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples, chapter 25. page 445.
24. Rieger, M., Lo Bianco, R., & Okie, W.R. (2003). Response of Prunus ferganensis, Prunus persica and two interspecific hybrids to moderate drought stress. Tree Physiology, 23, 51-58.
25. Shamshiri, M.H., & Fattahi, M. (2016). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosystem II activity of three pistachio rootstocks under salt stress as probed by the OJIP_test. Russ. Journal of Plant Physiology, 63(1), 101–110.
26. Strasser, R., Srivastava, A., & Tsimilli_Michael, M. (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to haracterize and screen photosynthetic samples, in Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanisms, Regulation and Adaptation, Yunus, M. Pathre, U., and Mohanty, P., Eds., London, UK: Taylor and Francis pp. 445–483. 7.
27. Strasser, R.J., Srivastava, A., & Tsimilli_Michael, M. (2004). Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient, in Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Papagrorgiou, G.C. and Govindjee, B.K., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer_Verlag pp. 321–362.
28. Tsimilli_Michael, M., Eggenberg, P., & Biro, B. (2000). Synergistic and antagonistic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Azospirillum and Rhizobium nitrogen_fixers on the photosynthetic activity of alfalfa, probed by the polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient OJIP, Apply Soil Ecology, 15, 169–182.
29. Xia, A., Li, Y., & Zou, D. (2004). Effects of salinity stress on PSII in Ulva lactuca as probed by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Aquatomy and Botany, 8, 129-137.
30. Yadollahi, A., Arzani, K., Ebadi, A., Wirthensohn, M., & Karimi, S. (2011). The response of different almond genotypes to moderate and severe water stress in order to screen for drought tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 129, 403-413.
31. Yaman, K., Kawasaki, M., Taniguchi, M., & Miyake, H. (2008). Correlation between chloroplast ultrastracture and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in the leaves of rice (Oryza sativa) grown under salinity. Plant Product Science, 11(1), 139-145.
32. Yao, J., Sun, D., Cen, H., Xu, H., Weng, H., Yuan, F., & He, Y. (2018). Phenotyping of arabidopsis drought stress response using kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence and multicolor fluorescence imaging. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00603
33. Zlatev, Z. (2009). Drought-induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence of young wheat plants. Biotechnoly Biotechnoly, 23(4), 438-441.
34. Zhou, R., Yu, X., Ottosen, C.O., Rosenqvist, E., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2017). Drought stress had a predominant effect over heat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biology, 17, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12870-017-0974-x