Sustainability of Organizational Changes in Iranian Private Banks: Strategies and Consequences

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 5, Volume 15, Autumn & Winter 2024 - Serial Number 30, February 2024, Pages 147-188   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/tmj.2023.81906.1416

Authors

Mohammad Sadegh Dadmehr¹; Yaghoob Maharati^{* 2}; Alireza Khorakian³; Fariborz Rahimnia³

¹Ph.D. Student of Organizational Behavior, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³Professor, Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
As the competitive environment has rapidly grown over the past two decades and seriously overshadowed the activities of private enterprises, unsuccessful changes, especially in terms of instability and unsustainability of the achievements, have become a fundamental challenge for such organizations as private banks. The research conducted in this field indicates that planning, directing, and sustaining the organizational change results is very difficult, and pervasive changes affecting the main elements of the organization do not meet the expected goals. Some researchers suggested that organizations have difficulty sustaining continuous improvement in the long term, especially after an initial period of two or three years. As in most cases, employees do not internalize the new changes and behaviors as their norms and mental beliefs and do not use them as a basis for their subsequent behaviors. The results and achievements of changes may become unstable and fade after a short time, and a return to prior behaviors may occur in some cases. Thus, the organization incurs significant financial and opportunity costs that weaken its competitive position. This is true for Iranian private banks as they do not depend financially on the government and are in a fiercely competitive environment. Therefore, the main questions are as follows: what are the strategies to achieve sustainable change, and what are their consequences in Iranian private banks?
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Different theories exist for organizational change, which can be used to support and guide research to find the roots and consequences of sustainable organizational change. Research on organizational change can be categorized into three types: 1) content models emphasizing the content and essence of change, 2) contingency models considering the context and environmental conditions, and 3) process models focusing on the stages of change. A review of different change models indicates that they focus only on the content, process, or implementation of change while not addressing the period after the implementation, including institutionalization and stabilization of change. Therefore, this research was conducted to bridge the existing gap and provide change managers and agents in Iranian private banks with a vision to understand deeply the strategies for sustaining organizational changes and their consequences.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The philosophical foundation of the present research performed in private banks was interpretivism with the qualitative approach, and the grounded theory strategy was used. In this research, the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin was used. The samples were purposefully selected by conducting snowball sampling on managers and experts of the private banks of Iran who have experience working in at least one change program in the past ten years, provided that one year lasted since achieving the results. The organizational change experts and researchers who had significant experiences were interviewed with a semi-structured method. The sampling continued to reach data and theoretical saturation. The collected data were analyzed by open, axial, and selective coding processes using the MAXQDA 20 software. Lincoln and Guba's criteria (credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability) were used to validate the results.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The research findings demonstrated that sustainable change is characterized by two features: stackability of change, including internalization of the change and its adaptation and alignment with the organizational components, and spreadability of change, including the ability to transfer experiences to other employees and apply the organizational change. According to the research findings, the strategies needed to implement sustainable changes in Iranian private banks include 1) empowering employees through training and utilizing work teams, 2) empowering the organization by establishing a knowledge management system and motivational mechanisms, the mobilization of financial resources, the scrutiny, and explanation of the organization's strategic plan, leadership style, effective processes, and agile structure. The consequences of sustainable changes include 1) employees' growth and excellence due to their increased psychological and behavioral maturity, 2) improved efficiency to increase financial resources and reduce organizational costs, and 3) improved effectiveness to satisfy the strategic stakeholders and gain a competitive advantage. The research findings are noteworthy in that sustainable organizational change is considered a way to increase the productivity and prosperity of human resources in the organization.
 
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
This research demonstrated that a change is sustainable and is institutionalized when it is internalized in employees' beliefs and becomes a basis for their subsequent behaviors. This is realized by applying employee and organization empowerment strategies. Therefore, it is suggested that change managers and agents in the country's private banks consider the empowerment of employees seriously by applying influential and continuous training and expanding teamwork by using the strategies identified in this research, and the empowerment of the organization by using a knowledge management system, motivational mechanisms, providing financial resources, checking and explaining the organization's strategic plan, applying an appropriate leadership style, effective processes, and structural agility.

Keywords

Sustainable Organizational Change; Private Banks; Change Management; Grounded Theory

References

Anderson, D., & Ackerman, L. (2001). Beyond Change Management, Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, (1^st ed).            

Ansoff, H. I., & McDonnell, E. (1990). Implanting strategic management, London: Prentice- Hall.

Arazmjoo, H. (2014). All around pattern of organizational change acceptation, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Allameh tabatabai university, Tehran. (in presian)

Armenakis, A., & Bedeian, A. (1999). Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s, Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.

Awad, R.; Sherratt, S., & Jefferies, M. (2013). Proposing a new model for organizational change management. Journal of Change Management, 123, 17-28.

Barnett, W., & Carroll, G. (1995). Modeling InTernal Organizational Change, Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 217-236.

Bate, P.; Khan, R., & Pye, A. (2000). Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: Where organization design meets organization development, Organization Science, 11, 197-211.

Bateman, N. (2005). Sustainability: the elusive element of process important, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3), 261-276.

Bateman, N., & David, A. (2002). Process improvement programmes: a model for assessing sustainability, International Journal of Operations & Prouduction Management. 22(5), 515-526.

Bateman, N., & Rich, N. (2003). Companies’ perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2), 185-99.

Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change, Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133–141.

Bessant, J., & Caffyn, S. (1997). High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement, International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 7-28.

Brannmark, M., & Benn, S. (2012). A proposed model for evaluating the sustainability of continuous change programmes, Journal of Change Management, 12(2), 231-245

Brown, D. R. (2021). An experimental approach development to organization development, translation: Alvani, S. M., Kheirandish, M., Mohammadbeigi, Z. & Abbaszadeh Avilagh, H. (1^st ed), Tehran: publication of saffar. (in Persian)

Buchanan, D.; Fitzgerald, L.; Ketley, D.; Gollop, R.; Jones, J. L.; Lamont, S. S.; Neath, A., & Whitby, E. (2005). No going back: a review of the literature on sustaining organizational change, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 189–205    

Burke, W. (1982). Organization development, Boston, MA: Little Brown.

Burke, W., & Litwin, G. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change, Journal of Management, 18, 523–545.

Burke, W. (2002). Organization change: Theory and practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). An introduction to changing organizational culture, In K. S. Cameron & R. E. Quinn, Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, 1-17. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Champy, J. (1995). Reengineering: A light that failed, Across the Board, 32(3), 27-31.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, London: Sage. Publications Ltd.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, k. g. (2006). Organization development & change, translation: Bararpour, k. (1^st ed), Tehran: publication of farazandish sabz. (in Persian)

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.

De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy: Process, content, context: An International Perspective, (4th ed), Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.

Divandary, A. (2005). Modeling strategic change in the banking industry, Research Journal of Economic, 5(19), 147-180. (in Persian)

Drew, J.; McCallum, B., & Roggenhofer, S. (2004). Journey to Lean: Making Operational Change Stick, Basing- stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Farasatkhah, M. (2021). Qualitative research method in social sciences with emphasis on grounded theory, (10^th ed), Tehran: publication of agah. (in Persian)

Fernandez, W. D. (2004). The grounded theory method and case study data in IS Research: Issues and Design, Information Systems Foundations Workshop: Constructing and Criticising.

French, W., & Bell, C. (2006). Organization development: behavioral science interventions for organization improvement, translation: Alvani, S. M. & Danaei fard, H. (12^th ed), Tehran: publication of safar. (in Persian)

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions, Mill Valley, Sociology Press.

Harzing, A. W., & Hofstede, G. (1996). Planned change in organization: the influence of national culture, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 14, 297-340.

Hayes, J. (2010). The theory & practice of change management, (3^rd ed), palgrave.

Hercleuous, L. (2001). An ethnographic study of culture in the context of organizational Change, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 426-446.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1972). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, (2^nd ed), Prentice – Hall Inc, Englewood Cliff, New Jersey.

Jaca, C.; Viles, E.; Mateo, R., & Santos, J. (2011). Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practice, The TQM Journal, 24(2), 142-154.

Jan nasar Ahmady, H.; Shirazi, A., Rahimnia, F., & Khorakian, A. R. (2019). Evaluating components of leader’s proceedings in successful execution of change programs, Transformation Management Journal, 11(2), 157-184. (in Persian)

Knodel, T. (2004). Preparing the organizational ‘soil’ for measurable and sustainable change: business value management and project governance, Journal of Change Management, 4(1), 45–6.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press.

Kotter, J. P. (1998). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail, In Harvard Business Review on Change, 1-21. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Lewin, K. (ed) (1951).  Field Theory in Social Science, Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin, (UK edition published 1952, ed. Dorwin Cartwright). London: Tavistoc

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquriry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lippitt, R.; Watson, J., & Westley, B. (1985). The Dynamics of Planned Change, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Luecke, R. (2003). Managing Change and Transition, Harvard Business Press, Boston, Massachusetts

Mirkamali, S. M., & Zainalipour, H. (2009). Suitable pattern of organizational change in all around universities through factor analysis, Journal of educative sciences (educative and pcychology sciences), university of shahid chamran of ahvaz, 5(3), 139-164. (in Persian)

Mohammadpour, A. (2019). Counter-Method: the philosophical underpinnings and practical procedures of qualitative methodology, (2^nd ed), Qum: publication of logos. (in Persian)

Nasehifar, V.; Arazmjoo, H., & Taghavifard, M. T. (2013). Integration pattern of organizational change: Study dimentions of content, process and context in success of organizational change, Journal of management and development process, 26(4), 49-71. (in Persian)

Phillips, J. R. (1983). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Organizational Change Management, Human Resource Management, 22(1-2), 183-199.

Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: an empirical test, Academy of Management Journal 37(15), 1121- 1166.

Safaee movahhed, S. (2021). Grounded theory: basic of thoretical, approaches and excutive procedures, (1^st ed), Tehran: publication of doran. (in Persian)

Schein, E. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Schroeder, D. M., & Robinson, A. G. (1991). America’s most successful export to Japan: continuous improvement programs, Sloan Management Review, 32(3), 67-81.

Senge, P. M.; Lichtenstein, B. B.; Kaeufer, K.; Bradbury, H., & Carroll, J. S. (2007). Collaborating for sustainability, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 44-53.

Senge P. M.; Kleiner, A.; Roberts, C.; Ross, R.; Roth, G., & Smith, B. (2007). Dance of change: the challenges to momentum in learning organization, translation: Akbari, H. & Soltani, M. (3^rd ed), Tehran: publication of asia. (in Persian)

Smith J. J. (2010). Air force organizational change: tracing the past- mapping the future, Published PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Washington State University

Smith, M. E. (2002). Success rates for different types of organizational change, Performance Improvements, 41(1), 26–35.

Stacy, R. (2013). Strategic thinking and the management of change, translation: Kazemi movahhed, M. (6^th ed), Tehran: publication of rasa. (in Persian)

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Baics of Qualitive Research.London, Sage Publications, Inc.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Baics of Qualitive Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (2^nd ed), London, SAGE Publications, Inc.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2018). Basic of qualitive research: techniques and procedures for grounded theory, translation: Afshar, E. (7th ed), Tehran: publication of nashreney. (in Persian)

Tabatabai mozabadi, S. M. (2019). Change management in integration process of banks and financial institutions, Tehran: publication of termeh. (in Persian)

Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation, In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 171-222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Vollmann, T. (1996). The transformation imperative: achieving market dominance throught radical change, Harvard Bussiness Press, (1^st ed), USA