Assessing the Organizational Transformation Based on Architecture in the Research Center of Iran's Parliament

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 5, Volume 16, Spring&Summer2024, July 2024, Pages 127-164   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/tmj.2024.87300.1557

Author

Salar Moradi^*

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
Organizational transformation based on architecture is one of the most important tools of change in organizations. This approach is emphasized in the field of information technology planning in public and private organizations. The benefits of architecture-based organizational transformation are obvious for all organizations. The more organizations face environmental changes, the more they need architecture-based organizational transformation. In other words, it is a rapid response to ever-changing and complex environments towards a common goal. Therefore, in an organization like the Parliament Research Center, organizational transformation based on architecture is a constructive approach to create transformation in the entire organizational structures of the country. Accordingly, this research aims to measure organizational transformation based on architecture within this organization.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Architecture-based organizational transformation is defined by alignment, integration, flexibility, and agility. All these four components are based on information technology. From the point of view of information technology, this type of transformation is focused on achieving the alignment of the market and information technology, supporting the organizations' strategies. In general, the alignment of information technology is a prerequisite to supporting intelligence in society and achieving digitization. The organizations' development is accelerated through integration based on information technology, reducing the risk of projects. In addition to improving the current state of organizational transformation, this integration type can advance the organizational goals. Since every organization is constantly under pressure from external factors, it requires a certain level of flexibility. The most important reason for organizational transformation based on architecture is the necessity of responsiveness against environmental changes. Agile organizational architecture is a new idea for improving the existing transformation tools. With an agile architectural process, the transformation process gains more momentum.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
This is quantitative research. The statistical population includes all managers, deputies, and experts of the Parliament Research Center in 2023, among which 95 people were selected using quota sampling. The tool for measuring organizational architecture was a researcher-made questionnaire developed using the existing theoretical models and related studies. Two indices of CVR and CVI were employed to assess the content validity of this questionnaire. In addition, a first-order confirmatory factor analysis was utilized in Amos Graphics software to estimate the questionnaire’s construct validity. Furthermore, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate its reliability.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The coefficient between alignment and integration, 0.85, was the biggest correlation coefficient between the latent variables. After that, the correlation between flexibility and empowerment with a coefficient of 0.78 was dramatic. The smallest correlation was calculated 0.51 belonged to the relationship between alignment and flexibility. The statistical indicators indicated the high validity of the organizational transformation construct, and thus, this research can be used as a basis for future research. In general, research findings indicated that organizational transformation based on architecture not only is a necessity for organizations but also it should be considered as a supreme goal.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
Many researchers have emphasized organizational architecture as a tool for transformation in organizations. Technology-based architecture not only affects organizational strategy, but also creates alignment between technical and social systems and, consequently, will increase organizational effectiveness. The organizational architecture is efficient when it creates integration in all the technology sectors. Furthermore, flexibility is necessary to accompany the changes in the architectural process. Considering the importance of architecture-based organizational transformation for all organizations, it is suggested that the top and middle management of the organization pursue architecture-based organizational transformation projects. To do so, the corporate strategies should be determined in advance and organizational transformation should be placed above them. The excellence of organizational culture is also important as one of the main solutions for improving organizational transformation based on architecture.

Keywords

Organizational transformation; organizational structure; information technology; Parliament Research Center

References

Abbasi, M. (2017). Technological organizational structure of future Iran police. Organizational Development Quarterly, 14(60), 57-82. (in Persian)

Adamska, A. (2021). The impact of information and communication technologies on the equity market. In The digitalization of financial markets, 2-18. Routledge.

Ahmadvand, A. M.; Eghbali, M. A.; Ahmadvand, M., & Eghbali, H. (2015). A comprehensive model for reengineering organizational processes in Faraja. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 10(4), 521-539. (in Persian)

Ambler, S.W. (2003). Agile Enterprise Architecture: Beyond Enterprise Data Modeling. In http://www.agiledata.org/ Accessed on 12 November 2004.

Anthony Jnr, B. (2020). Applying enterprise architecture for digital transformation of electro mobility towards sustainable transportation. In Proceedings of the 2020 on Computers and People Research Conference. 38-46.

Anthony Jnr, B. (2021). Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture–a review and research agenda. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(3), 299-331.

Bai, F. (2022). Integration Project Based on Computer Information Technology Management System. In 2022 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC), 1088-1092.

Baneshi, Z.; Vaziri, A., & Pari, A. R. (2012). Comprehensive IT roadmap for municipalities. Tehran: Rah Dan Publication. (in Persian)

Beckhard, R., & Pritchard W. (1992). Changing the Essence: The Art of Creating and Leading Fundamental Change in Organizations. CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Beese, J.; Aier, S.; Haki, K., & Winter, R. (2023). The impact of enterprise architecture management on information systems architecture complexity. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(6), 1070-1090.

Bergeron, F.; Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. 41, 1003-1020.

Berlière, J. M., & Lévy, R. (2020). The evolving organization of policing: From the Ancien Régime to de Gaulle and the Police Nationale. In Policing in France, 21-38. Routledge.

Biraei, H., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010). The challenge of business and IT alignment: Enterprise architecture as a solution for strategic alignment. Production and Operations Management, 1(1), 1-22. (in Persian)

Charles, J. (2004). Enterprise Integration Modeling, in Petrie (Ed.), MIT Press.

Christou, E., & Piller, F. (2024). Organizational Transformation: A Management Research Perspective. In: Letmathe, P., et al. Transformation Towards Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54700-3_11

Cohen. Clinger Act (1996). An earlier version of the legislation (H.R. 1530/S. 1026) was vetoed by the President on December 22, 1995. U.S. House, Committee on National Security, H. Report No. 104-131; U.S. Senate, Committee on Armed Services, S. Report No. 104-112; U.S. House, Conference Report, H. Report No. 104-406.

Darvishi, S.; Abdiyan, B.; Kanani, A., & Hosseini, S. M. (2020). Skills pathology of police chiefs in utilizing command and control center systems. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 15(3), 1-20. (in Persian)

Eseryel, Y., & Wolff, N. (2005)."Enterprise Architecture as a Context for ERP Implementation". Journal of Enterprise Architecture. November 2005.

Furukawa, M., & Minami, A. (2013). A Study on the 'Flexibility' of Information Systems (Part 1): Why Do They Need to Be Flexible? International Journal of Business and Management, 8(20), 48.

Gao, X.; Wu, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Research on information integration of construction project management based on BIM. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 267(3), 32-69. IOP Publishing.

Ghorbanizadeh, V.; Nourbakhsh, M., & Mansourian, E. (2011). Critical success factors for knowledge management in public organizations. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 6(3), 470-486. (in Persian)

Greta A. James, Brian, Burke. (2005). Understand the Maturity of Your Enterprise Architecture. Gartner Research, Program Publication Date: 17 November, ID Number: G00136105(www.gartner.com)

Gutterman, A. S. (2023). Organizational Design. Available at SSRN 4541482.

Hinkelmann, K., & Thönssen B. (Eds.) (2015). Proceedings of the ES 2015, Third International Conference on Enterprise Systems. Basel, Switzerland, 14-15 October 2015. IEEE Computer Society Publications.

Jalilian, S.; Alambeigi, A.; Hejazi, Y.; Rezvanfar, A., & Rezaei, A. (2021). Organizational change content analysis towards the implementation of an information system in Iran’s fisheries organization. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 32(2), 1-32. (in Persian)

Kang, D.; Lee, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Alignment of Business Enterprise Architecture using fact-based ontologies. Expert system with Application 37, 3274-3283.

Khayami, Raouf. (2011). Qualitative characteristics of enterprise architecture. Procedia Computer Science 3, 1277-1282.

Kotusev, S.; Kurnia, S., & Dilnutt, R. (2023). Enterprise architecture artifacts as boundary objects: An empirical analysis. Information and Software Technology, 155, 107108.

Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business research, 122, 700-712.

Mahjoorian, A. R., & Shams, F. (2009). Developing a service-oriented enterprise architecture planning methodology in full compliance with Zachman framework. Fourteenth Annual National Conference of the Computer Society of Iran, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, 20-21 March 2009. (in Persian)

Mirković, V.; Lukić, J.; Lazarević, S., & Vojinović, Ž. (2019). Key characteristics of organizational structure that supports digital transformation. In International Scientific Conference Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management.

Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2020). The benefits of enterprise architecture in organizational transformation. Business & information systems engineering, 62, 585-597.

Nourian Aval, A. A. (2012). The effect of IT enterprise architecture on enterprise resource planning systems. Master's thesis in IT engineering (information systems management), Faculty of E-Learning, University of Shiraz. Supervisor: Dr. Raoof Khayami. (in Persian)

Rahnavard, F., & Davoudi, E. (2005). Comparison of enterprise architecture in petrochemical and gas companies. Knowledge Management, 71, 89-107. (in Persian)

Ramazan Ghomi, M. (2016). Confronting the challenges of future enterprise architecture. Third International Conference on Behavioral Sciences and Technology Research, Berlin, Germany, September 2016. (in Persian)

Ranaei Kordshuli, H., & Alavi, S. M. (2019). Organizational change in Iran’s oil industry: A proposed model for creating knowledge-based organizations. Strategic and Macro Policies, 7(25), 2-29. doi: 10.32598/JMSP.7.1.2 (in Persian)

Samadi Avansar, A. (2005). Introduction to enterprise architecture for managers. Tehran: Secretariat of the High Council of Information. (in Persian)

Sasa, A., & Krisper, Marjan. (2011). Enterprise architecture patterns for business process support analysis. The Journal of System and Software, 84(9), September 2011, Pages 1480–1506.

Sauer, C., & Willcocks, L. (2003). Establishing the Business of the Future: The Role of Organizational Architecture and Information Technologies. European Management Journal, 21(4), 497-508.

Shakeri, R.; Rahman-Sarshad, H.; Molaei, S., & Abdolmaleki, M. (2021). Explaining the role of context and enterprise architecture in developing individual ambidexterity in knowledge-based companies. Transformation Management Research Quarterly, 13(1), 1-22. (in Persian)

Silverman, L. L. (1997). Organizational Architecture: A Framework for Successful Transformation, Partners for Progress.

Sinaei, V., & Zamani, S. (2012). The Islamic Consultative Assembly and policymaking in Iran (1979-2008). Political Science Research, 11(new), 1-35. (in Persian)

Tamm, T.; Seddon, P. B., & Shanks, G. (2022). How enterprise architecture leads to organisational benefits. International journal of information management, 67, 102554.

Technical Committee of Information Architecture. (2011). Iran’s enterprise architecture framework. Secretariat of the High Council of Information, Iran. (in Persian)

Veasey, P. W. (2001). Use of enterprise architectures in managing strategic change, Business Process Management Journal, 7)5(, 430-436.

Villarreal, R. (2015). Enterprise architecture of sustainable development: an analytical framework, in: Saha, P. (2015) A Systemic Perspective to Managing Complexity with Enterprise Architecture, IGI Global.

Wessel, L.; Baiyere, A.; Ologeanu-Taddei, R.; Cha, J., & Blegind-Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 22 (1), 102-129.