Developing and Validating a Model for Effectiveness of Organizational Punishments

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 11, Volume 16, Autumn&Winter2025 - Serial Number 32, January 2025, Pages 416-448   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/tmj.2024.90138.1614

Authors

Masoud Salehi¹; Hamid Rezaei Far^{* 2}; Mohammad Mohammadi²; Hossein Hakimpur²

¹Doctoral student of Management Department, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran.

²Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran.

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
Organizations, especially public ones, require maintaining discipline and order to achieve their goals. Organizational punishment is one of the key tools for managing undesirable behaviors of employees. If designed and implemented correctly, this tool can reduce inappropriate behaviors, improve performance, and strengthen organizational culture. However, its effectiveness depends on various factors, such as criteria transparency, fairness in execution, and consideration of short- and long-term consequences. In many public organizations, improper use of punishments or the lack of well-defined and effective policies may lead to increased deviations and decreased productivity. Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to design and validate a comprehensive and effective model for organizational punishments with a focus on public organizations in Razavi Khorasan Province. This model can help managers and policymakers scientifically and logically reduce deviations and enhance employee performance.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This study is based on well-known theories and models in management and organizational behavior literature. One of the most driving frameworks, Skinner’s theory states that employees' behaviors are influenced by their positive or negative consequences. In this regard, punishment can be a negative consequence leading to changes in employee behavior. The utilitarian theory emphasizes the importance of deterrence in reducing undesirable behaviors, suggesting punishment should be designed to prevent future deviations while compensating for damages. Bandura’s social learning theory highlights the impact of modeling behaviors in organizations and emphasizes the importance of direct training and demonstration of appropriate behaviors. Additionally, Kant’s theory stresses the necessity of justice in implementing punishments, asserting that no punishment should be administered without adherence to ethical and legal principles. These theoretical frameworks shaped a basis for analyzing this research's data and provided a foundation to design a comprehensive, scientific model for the effectiveness of organizational punishment.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
This mixed-method study was conducted in two qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, thematic analysis was used to extract concepts and main themes. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with nine executive managers and five university professors specializing in organizational behavior, human resources, psychology, law, and sociology. Sampling in this phase was purposive and snowball-based. In the quantitative phase, the statistical population consisted of 8,936 public managers in Razavi Khorasan Province. The sample size was determined using Cochran’s formula, and a minimum of 368 participants were selected through stratified random sampling. The data collection tool for the quantitative phase was a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha (above 0.7). Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The study’s findings revealed that the effectiveness of organizational punishments is summarized in three main themes and fourteen components. The first theme, the effectiveness of the punishment system, includes the goals of punishment, clear and fair criteria, and appropriate timing for implementing punishments. This theme emphasizes that punishments should be designed and executed aimed at preventing deviations, compensating for damages, and correcting employee behavior. The second theme, the effectiveness of organizational structure, highlights the roles of formalization and problem-solving in the punishment process. Formalization refers to the presence of transparent and law-based guidelines that inform employees about the consequences of undesirable behaviors and help to make fair decisions. Problem-solving involves identifying and analyzing the root causes of violations and proposing preventive measures. The third theme, the deterrent effectiveness of punishment, comprises training, reform, transformation, and improving individual and organizational performance. Training employees about laws and regulations, transparent communication, and offering opportunities for behavioral correction play significant roles in reducing the need for punishments. Furthermore, deterrent mechanisms can reduce costs associated with violations and enhance organizational productivity.
 
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
This study has presented a comprehensive and effective model for organizational punishments, which can significantly reduce deviations, improve individual and organizational performance, and enhance productivity. The results indicate that punishments are effective when based on clear, fair, and proportionate criteria and executed justly. Additionally, continuous training and organizational culture-building can reduce the need for punishments and reinforce positive behaviors. It is recommended that organizations review their punishment guidelines and adopt corrective and educational approaches tailored to their cultural and structural needs to reduce violations. Additional recommendations for increasing the effectiveness of punitive policies in organizations are implementing intelligent monitoring systems, organizing training programs, and enhancing managerial skills in punishment and reward policies.

Keywords

Organizational Punishment; Behavior Effectiveness; Human Resource Management; Deterrence; Organizational Structure; Training

References

References

Amalia, A. R. A., & Maupa, H. (2023). The Effect of Reward and Punishment on Employee Performance with Work Discipline as Intervening Variable at PT BPRS Niaga Madani. Economics and Business Journal (ECBIS), 1(5), 661-672. https://doi.org/10.47353/ecbis.v1i5.78

Asadullah, A. B. M.; Juhdi, N. B.; Islam, M. N.; Ahmed, A. A. A., & Abdullah, A. B. M. (2019). The effect of reinforcement and punishment on employee performance. ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 8(2), 47-58. DOI:10.18034/abcjar.v8i2.87

Ball, G. A.; Trevino, L. K., & Sims, Jr, H. P. (1994) Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship, Academy of Management Journal, 37(1): 299-322.

Bandura, A. (1976) "Self-reinforcement: Theoretical and methodological considerations," Behaviorism, 4: pp. 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bugdol, M., & Puciato, D. (2023). Punishment of employees–its causes, types, and consequences, as well as factors determining punishment for poor quality. International Journal of Contemporary Management. doi: 10.2478/ijcm-2023-0008

Chaterchi, N., & Faqihipour, J. (2019). Identifying the means of punishing employees with an intergenerational management approach in the social security organization. Social security, 16(1), 13-87. https://qjo.ssor.ir/article_105663.html

Chaterchi, N., & Faqihipour, J. (2018). Cooperation in the research project of designing a model of human resources management based on the difference of generations in the social security organization) with an emphasis on the motivational aspects of employee management (Higher Institute of Social Security Research), https://www.sid.ir/paper/952061/fa

Chaterchi, N., & Faqihipour, J. (2019). Intergenerational management in the social security organization. In cooperation with the Iranian Management Association and the Union of Scientific, Technological, Innovation and Commercialization Associations, 1 ed, Tehran: Dar al-Funun

Crumpacker, M., & Crumpacker, J, M. (2007). Succession Planning and Generational Stereotypes: Should HR Consider Age-Based Values and Attitudes a Relevant Factor or a Passing Fad, Public Personnel Management. 36(4), pp. 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600703600405

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981); “Evaluating Structural Equation Modeling with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error”; Journal of Marking Research, 18(1),39-50.

Frey, E.; Adams, G. S.; Pfeffer, J., & Belmi, P. (2023). What we (do not) know about punishment across organizational boundaries. Journal of Management, 49(1), 196-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221106420

Garner, E. (2012). Effective Discipline: How to manage discipline at work. New York: Eric Garner & Ventus Publishing Aps.

Ghomi, N.; Qasemi Pirbaluti, M.; Esfahani, N., & Baqaei Hossein Abadi, M. (2016). Predicting the general health of employees using the incentive and punishment system, individual performance and organizational performance in Isfahan Shahr Gas Company. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology, 18(1), 119-126. https://sid.ir/paper/164036/fa

 Houwelingen, G, V.; Van, Dijke, M.; Hoogervorst, N.; Meijs, L., & De Cremer, D. (2022). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Punishment and Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908021

Indrawan, M. I. (2023). The Influence of Work Stress, Rewards and Punishments on Organizational Commitment with Work Conflict as an Intervening Variable in the Department of Public Works and Spatial Planning in Binjai City. SINOMIKA Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 2(3), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.54443/sinomika.v2i3.1326

Jalali, N.; Gholamidon, H., & Goldouzian, I. (2020). Structuring social-criminal justice by institutionalizing the semi-liberty system. Ethical researches, 39(10), 59-80

Khairandish, M.; Bakhshandeh, S., & Shabani, S. (2017). Meta-analysis of studies on the difference of work values ​​in different generations of human resources, 7(2), 67-92 https://obs.sinaweb.net/article_32523.html

Kadkhodaei, A, A., & Fallah Soluklaei, M. (2011). Persian title: The system of encouraging and punishing government officials in Islam (Arabic title: Nizam al-Targhib wa al-Tarhib for the obligations of government officials in Islam). Islamic Government, 16(3), SID. https://sid.ir/paper/487998/fa

Merhi, M. I., & Ahluwalia, P. (2013). Information Security Policies Compliance: The Role of Organizational Punishment. In AMCIS.

Mohammadi Moghadam, Y.; Wahabzadeh, SH.; Taqvi Qasimabad, A, H., & Mandari, Javad. (2014). The relationship between perceived organizational control and fear of punishment, with employees' internet time in the workplace (case study: Iran Khodro Industrial Group. Smart Business Management Studies. 3(12), 21-52, https://ims.atu .ac.ir/article_1962.html

Mooijman, M., & Graham, J. (2018). Unjust punishment in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 95-106.

Mooijman, M.; Van Dijk, W. W.; Ellemers, N., & Van Dijk, E. (2015). Why leaders punish: a power perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000021

Movahed, M. A. (2002). In the air of justice and justice, 1 ed. Tehran: Karnameh.

Nikolay, N.; Deryuga.; Artem, N., & Deryuga, M. (2024). Administrative and Penal Issues of the Efficiency of Administrative Punishments. Administrativnoe pravo i process. doi: 10.18572/2071-1166-2024-3-7-11

Pramesti, R. A.; Sambul, S. A., & Rumawas, W. (2019). “Pengaruh Reward dan Punishment terhadap Kinerja Karyawan KFC Artha Gading”. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 9(1), 57-63.  https://doi.org/10.35797/jab.v9.i1.57-63

Saif, A, A. (2020). Modern educational psychology, Tehran: Doran.

Sajjadi, S, Y.; Hadoinejad, M.; Ziaaldini, M., & Beheshti Far, M. (2023). A comparative study of encouraging and punishing public affairs managers in the Alavi system with other common management systems. Excellence of Human Resources. 4(3), 114-141 https://www.sid.ir/paper/1115933/fa

Saraswati, S.; Mustafa, H., & Farida, U. (2023). Implementation of reward and punishment on the performance of asn and non asn at the regional secretariat of luwu utara district. Point of View Research Economic Development, 4(1), 1-5.

Seyed Javadin, S. R. (2021). Human Resource Management and Employee Affairs. Negah Danesh.

Septiana, R. I., & Adinata, U, V, S. (2022). Employee work discipline: the effect of reward and punishment. doi: 10.55208/jebe. v16i2.304

Shimon, L., & Randall, S. (2015). Management of staff affairs and human resources, 9 ed, Tehran, presidential public administration training center.

Skaggs, B. C.; Manz, C. C.; Lyle, M. C., & Pearce, C. L. (2018). On the folly of punishing A while hoping for A: Exploring punishment in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 812-815.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2287

Skinner, B. F. (2014). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis, 3: BF Skinner Foundation.

Sugianto, A., Firdaus, M. A., Rinda, R. T., & Maulana, H. (2021). Pengaruh Reward dan Punishment terhadap Disiplin Kerja Karyawan pada PT. Astra Otoparts Tbk. Divisi Adiwira Plastik. Manager: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 4(3), 493-500. https://doi.org/10.32832/manager.v4i4.6045

Trevino, L. K. (1992) The social effects of punishment in organizations: a justice perspective, Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 647-676.

Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Yi, T., & Li, W. (2022). Understanding the deterrence effect of punishment for marine information security policies non-compliance. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.001

Wijaya, L. F. (2021). Sistem Reward dan Punishment sebagai Pemicu dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. JIKEM: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen,1(2), 1-11  https://doi.org/10.24929/missy.v2i2.1681

Wang, X.; Wang, CH.; Tianyu, Yi., & Wen-li, Li. (2022). Understanding the deterrence effect of punishment for marine information security policies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.001

Yan, H.; Hu, X., & Wu, C. H. (2021). When and how can organizational punishment stop unethical pro-organizational behaviors in hospitality? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102811